Matter of Opinion?

Historical knowledge and information regarding our great game.
Post Reply
James Pratt
Posts: 730
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:10 pm

Matter of Opinion?

Post by James Pratt » Tue May 26, 2026 2:46 pm

I have been writing about Bronstein-v-Szabo from the 1948 Interzonal. BCM at the time called it ' .. rather a disappointing game .. ' but Keene/Taulbut's book on the Tarrasch French pipe-up ' a beautiful game.'
Can they both be right? Easy to overlook, but apparently it decided much in qualification terms.
James

Geoff Chandler
Posts: 3825
Joined: Mon Jul 06, 2009 1:36 pm
Location: Under Cover
Contact:

Re: Matter of Opinion?

Post by Geoff Chandler » Tue May 26, 2026 3:44 pm

The game in question. Do not know how one would class a game as `disappointing` a 10 move prearranged draw falls into the disappointing category. This game had it's moments.

https://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1033718


Regarding qualification, without a doubt this victory by Bronstein helped, Bronstein finished one point ahead of Szabo. However, In the final round Szabo lost to Lundin who finished last, his win (as black) v Szabo was his only win in the event.

User avatar
Matt Mackenzie
Posts: 6386
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:51 pm
Location: Millom, Cumbria

Re: Matter of Opinion?

Post by Matt Mackenzie » Tue May 26, 2026 4:05 pm

Lundin's win being a "genesis" of what we now know as the Benko Gambit. What is maybe more remarkable is his beating Szabo (ostensibly a stronger player) in all three of their tournament meetings, and each time with the Black pieces.
"Set up your attacks so that when the fire is out, it isn't out!" (H N Pillsbury)

Roger de Coverly
Posts: 22665
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm

Re: Matter of Opinion?

Post by Roger de Coverly » Tue May 26, 2026 4:11 pm

Geoff Chandler wrote: ↑
Tue May 26, 2026 3:44 pm
The game in question. Do not know how one would class a game as `disappointing` a 10 move prearranged draw falls into the disappointing category. This game had it's moments.
Perhaps the BCM saw it as a GM playing on a piece down rather than as a rapid bust of the French.
Geoff Chandler wrote: ↑
Tue May 26, 2026 3:44 pm
However, In the final round Szabo lost to Lundin who finished last, his win (as black) v Szabo was his only win in the event.
Lundin also played one of the earliest examples of the Benko/Volga Gambit idea against Bronstein. Bronstein later used the same idea against Taimanov in the 1953 Candidates.

It later appears in a game in the 1960/61 Hastings between Barden and John Littlewood.

User avatar
John Clarke
Posts: 915
Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2011 1:07 pm

Re: Matter of Opinion?

Post by John Clarke » Tue May 26, 2026 10:28 pm

Norman Littlewood encountered it at the 1966 Olympiad (see here) where, to quote Hartston's comment in Chess, he "made [it] look faintly ridiculous".
"The chess-board is the world ..... the player on the other side is hidden from us ..... he never overlooks a mistake, or makes the smallest allowance for ignorance."
(He doesn't let you resign and start again, either.)

NickFaulks
Posts: 9290
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 1:28 pm

Re: Matter of Opinion?

Post by NickFaulks » Fri May 29, 2026 10:17 am

John Clarke wrote: ↑
Tue May 26, 2026 10:28 pm
Norman Littlewood encountered it at the 1966 Olympiad (see here) where, to quote Hartston's comment in Chess, he "made [it] look faintly ridiculous".
5.e3 ( found at the board? ) remains one of the most irritating lines for Benko players.
If you want a picture of the future, imagine a QR code stamped on a human face — forever.

Post Reply