I have been writing about Bronstein-v-Szabo from the 1948 Interzonal. BCM at the time called it ' .. rather a disappointing game .. ' but Keene/Taulbut's book on the Tarrasch French pipe-up ' a beautiful game.'
Can they both be right? Easy to overlook, but apparently it decided much in qualification terms.
James
Matter of Opinion?
-
Geoff Chandler
- Posts: 3825
- Joined: Mon Jul 06, 2009 1:36 pm
- Location: Under Cover
- Contact:
Re: Matter of Opinion?
The game in question. Do not know how one would class a game as `disappointing` a 10 move prearranged draw falls into the disappointing category. This game had it's moments.
https://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1033718
Regarding qualification, without a doubt this victory by Bronstein helped, Bronstein finished one point ahead of Szabo. However, In the final round Szabo lost to Lundin who finished last, his win (as black) v Szabo was his only win in the event.
https://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1033718
Regarding qualification, without a doubt this victory by Bronstein helped, Bronstein finished one point ahead of Szabo. However, In the final round Szabo lost to Lundin who finished last, his win (as black) v Szabo was his only win in the event.
- Matt Mackenzie
- Posts: 6386
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:51 pm
- Location: Millom, Cumbria
Re: Matter of Opinion?
Lundin's win being a "genesis" of what we now know as the Benko Gambit. What is maybe more remarkable is his beating Szabo (ostensibly a stronger player) in all three of their tournament meetings, and each time with the Black pieces.
"Set up your attacks so that when the fire is out, it isn't out!" (H N Pillsbury)
-
Roger de Coverly
- Posts: 22665
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm
Re: Matter of Opinion?
Perhaps the BCM saw it as a GM playing on a piece down rather than as a rapid bust of the French.Geoff Chandler wrote: ↑Tue May 26, 2026 3:44 pmThe game in question. Do not know how one would class a game as `disappointing` a 10 move prearranged draw falls into the disappointing category. This game had it's moments.
Lundin also played one of the earliest examples of the Benko/Volga Gambit idea against Bronstein. Bronstein later used the same idea against Taimanov in the 1953 Candidates.Geoff Chandler wrote: ↑Tue May 26, 2026 3:44 pmHowever, In the final round Szabo lost to Lundin who finished last, his win (as black) v Szabo was his only win in the event.
It later appears in a game in the 1960/61 Hastings between Barden and John Littlewood.
- John Clarke
- Posts: 915
- Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2011 1:07 pm
Re: Matter of Opinion?
Norman Littlewood encountered it at the 1966 Olympiad (see here) where, to quote Hartston's comment in Chess, he "made [it] look faintly ridiculous".
"The chess-board is the world ..... the player on the other side is hidden from us ..... he never overlooks a mistake, or makes the smallest allowance for ignorance."
(He doesn't let you resign and start again, either.)
(He doesn't let you resign and start again, either.)
-
NickFaulks
- Posts: 9290
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 1:28 pm
Re: Matter of Opinion?
5.e3 ( found at the board? ) remains one of the most irritating lines for Benko players.John Clarke wrote: ↑Tue May 26, 2026 10:28 pmNorman Littlewood encountered it at the 1966 Olympiad (see here) where, to quote Hartston's comment in Chess, he "made [it] look faintly ridiculous".
If you want a picture of the future, imagine a QR code stamped on a human face — forever.