ICCF IM Andrew Dearnley
-
Simon Rogers
- Posts: 2447
- Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2020 4:30 pm
ICCF IM Andrew Dearnley
I am sorry to inform you that Andrew Dearnley passed away in October 2025 at the age of just 61.
Andrew's contribution to correspondence chess was enormous.
He was the EFCC President in 2016 but stood down due to ill health. He was England's International Secretary from 2008 to 2017 and again in 2019. He was also a member of several of England's sub-committees.
Andrew also carried out a considerable amount of work for the ICCF where he was Marketing Director from 2013 to 2017, and was also Non-Title Tournament Commissioner from 2011 to 2013. He introduced the ICCF Aspirers events to the ICCF calendar which are extremely popular.
Andrew obtained the International Master title and the Senior International Master title in 2014, and the International Arbiter title in 2010.
Andrew was a Life Patron of the EFCC. He was awarded the ICCF Bertyl von-Massow medal in 2016.
England will hold a Memorial tournament for Andrew which is likely to start in 2026.
RIP
Andrew's contribution to correspondence chess was enormous.
He was the EFCC President in 2016 but stood down due to ill health. He was England's International Secretary from 2008 to 2017 and again in 2019. He was also a member of several of England's sub-committees.
Andrew also carried out a considerable amount of work for the ICCF where he was Marketing Director from 2013 to 2017, and was also Non-Title Tournament Commissioner from 2011 to 2013. He introduced the ICCF Aspirers events to the ICCF calendar which are extremely popular.
Andrew obtained the International Master title and the Senior International Master title in 2014, and the International Arbiter title in 2010.
Andrew was a Life Patron of the EFCC. He was awarded the ICCF Bertyl von-Massow medal in 2016.
England will hold a Memorial tournament for Andrew which is likely to start in 2026.
RIP
Last edited by Simon Rogers on Thu Dec 25, 2025 10:18 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Matt Mackenzie
- Posts: 6387
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:51 pm
- Location: Millom, Cumbria
Re: IMO Andrew Dearnley
Sorry for my ignorance, but what does IMO stand for here?
"Set up your attacks so that when the fire is out, it isn't out!" (H N Pillsbury)
-
Simon Rogers
- Posts: 2447
- Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2020 4:30 pm
Re: IMO Andrew Dearnley
International Master Correspondence Chess.Matt Mackenzie wrote: ↑Thu Dec 11, 2025 1:01 pmSorry for my ignorance, but what does IMO stand for here?
It was a reply to me in the Toni Halliwell obituary.
- Christopher Kreuzer
- Posts: 10981
- Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 2:34 am
- Location: London
Re: IMO Andrew Dearnley
I will quote here what I said then (click the up arrow to go to the original thread):
When I said "IMO", I was saying "in my opinion". I was NOT saying that IMO is a chess title abbreviation!!Christopher Kreuzer wrote: ↑Thu Oct 09, 2025 11:39 amThe thread titles should, IMO, get the chess titles right. If these are all CC titles (nothing wrong with those) that needs to be made clear. Thank you, Simon, for flagging up this death. It is a bit sad that she posted about some of her contemporaries (including Miss Loftus) but no-one (including me) thought to document or record more memories in the time available (another 15 years it turned out). Maybe she wrote down or related some memories to others?
-
Simon Rogers
- Posts: 2447
- Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2020 4:30 pm
Re: IMO Andrew Dearnley
Sorry, got confused.Christopher Kreuzer wrote: ↑Thu Dec 11, 2025 3:47 pmI will quote here what I said then (click the up arrow to go to the original thread):
When I said "IMO", I was saying "in my opinion". I was NOT saying that IMO is a chess title abbreviation!!Christopher Kreuzer wrote: ↑Thu Oct 09, 2025 11:39 amThe thread titles should, IMO, get the chess titles right. If these are all CC titles (nothing wrong with those) that needs to be made clear. Thank you, Simon, for flagging up this death. It is a bit sad that she posted about some of her contemporaries (including Miss Loftus) but no-one (including me) thought to document or record more memories in the time available (another 15 years it turned out). Maybe she wrote down or related some memories to others?
What is the correct title?
- Christopher Kreuzer
- Posts: 10981
- Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 2:34 am
- Location: London
Re: IMO Andrew Dearnley
https://www.efcchess.org.uk/ccTitles.html
I think the clearest way is to name the awarding body, the ICCF.
Hence:
ICCF GM
ICCF IM
FIDE GM
FIDE IM
Technically, the Fide title is IGM (International Grandmaster), but that is a bit of a can of worms.
EDIT: With apologies to Andrew Dearnley! Maybe someone has a game of his that can be posted?
Which is a bit unhelpful.International Correspondence Chess titles are awarded by the Worlds Governing body, the International Correspondence Chess Federation. ICCF awards titles in recognition of a players' achievements. Qualification for these titles is dependent upon achieving Norms (linked to Ratings) in ICCF International Title events. Listed below are the various ICCF Titles:
Grandmaster - (GM)
Senior International Master - (SIM)
International Master - (IM)
Correspondence Chess Master (CCM). Female players can have this Title converted to Ladies Grandmaster - (LGM)
Correspondence Chess Expert (CCE). Female players can have this Title converted to International Ladies Master (LIM)
International Arbiter (IA)
I think the clearest way is to name the awarding body, the ICCF.
Hence:
ICCF GM
ICCF IM
FIDE GM
FIDE IM
Technically, the Fide title is IGM (International Grandmaster), but that is a bit of a can of worms.
EDIT: With apologies to Andrew Dearnley! Maybe someone has a game of his that can be posted?
-
Simon Rogers
- Posts: 2447
- Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2020 4:30 pm
Re: IMO Andrew Dearnley
Thanks for that Christopher. Sorry that I appeared a bit ignorant, I didnt know how the title system is named or works in Correspondence Chess.Christopher Kreuzer wrote: ↑Thu Dec 11, 2025 4:29 pmhttps://www.efcchess.org.uk/ccTitles.html
Which is a bit unhelpful.International Correspondence Chess titles are awarded by the Worlds Governing body, the International Correspondence Chess Federation. ICCF awards titles in recognition of a players' achievements. Qualification for these titles is dependent upon achieving Norms (linked to Ratings) in ICCF International Title events. Listed below are the various ICCF Titles:
Grandmaster - (GM)
Senior International Master - (SIM)
International Master - (IM)
Correspondence Chess Master (CCM). Female players can have this Title converted to Ladies Grandmaster - (LGM)
Correspondence Chess Expert (CCE). Female players can have this Title converted to International Ladies Master (LIM)
International Arbiter (IA)
I think the clearest way is to name the awarding body, the ICCF.
Hence:
ICCF GM
ICCF IM
FIDE GM
FIDE IM
Technically, the Fide title is IGM (International Grandmaster), but that is a bit of a can of worms.
EDIT: With apologies to Andrew Dearnley! Maybe someone has a game of his that can be posted?
Hope we are okay.
- Christopher Kreuzer
- Posts: 10981
- Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 2:34 am
- Location: London
Re: IMO Andrew Dearnley
Absolutely fine. It confuses a lot of people. Not many know about SIM!
Re: IMO Andrew Dearnley
Very sorry to hear that Andrew has died.
Someone asked for a game, so...
[Event "BCCA Counter-Gambit Tournament"]
[Date "2005.??.??"]
[White "Dearnley, Andrew"]
[Black "Tait, Jonathan"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "C57"]
[PlyCount "45"]
[GameId "289008202868"]
[EventDate "2005.??.??"]
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Nf6 4. Ng5 d5 5. exd5 b5 6. Bf1 Nd4 7. c3 Nxd5 8. Nxf7 Kxf7 9. cxd4 exd4 10. Bxb5 Qe7+ 11. Kf1 Bb7 12. Bc4 Rd8 13. d3 Qf6 14. Nd2 Qf5 15. h4 h6 16. h5 Be7 17. Rh3 Kg8 18. Qe2 Bf6 19. Ne4 Kh7 20. Nxf6+ Nxf6 21. Bf7 Qd7 22. Bg6+ Kg8 23. Bf4 1-0
Quite nice from Andrew's perspective at least.
Someone asked for a game, so...
[Event "BCCA Counter-Gambit Tournament"]
[Date "2005.??.??"]
[White "Dearnley, Andrew"]
[Black "Tait, Jonathan"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "C57"]
[PlyCount "45"]
[GameId "289008202868"]
[EventDate "2005.??.??"]
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Nf6 4. Ng5 d5 5. exd5 b5 6. Bf1 Nd4 7. c3 Nxd5 8. Nxf7 Kxf7 9. cxd4 exd4 10. Bxb5 Qe7+ 11. Kf1 Bb7 12. Bc4 Rd8 13. d3 Qf6 14. Nd2 Qf5 15. h4 h6 16. h5 Be7 17. Rh3 Kg8 18. Qe2 Bf6 19. Ne4 Kh7 20. Nxf6+ Nxf6 21. Bf7 Qd7 22. Bg6+ Kg8 23. Bf4 1-0
Quite nice from Andrew's perspective at least.
blog inspired by Bronstein's book, but using my own games: http://200opengames.blogspot.co.uk/
- Christopher Kreuzer
- Posts: 10981
- Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 2:34 am
- Location: London
Re: IMO Andrew Dearnley
Adding the pgn tags to the game Jon Tait provided.
Was this a tournament where the first few moves were pre-determined, and how many of those moves in this case? Do we have more moves, or do correspondence players stop at the point that the win becomes more obvious than in OTB chess?
Was this a tournament where the first few moves were pre-determined, and how many of those moves in this case? Do we have more moves, or do correspondence players stop at the point that the win becomes more obvious than in OTB chess?
- John Clarke
- Posts: 915
- Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2011 1:07 pm
Re: IMO Andrew Dearnley
Maybe Andrew sent a convincing "conditional" with his 23rd move?
"The chess-board is the world ..... the player on the other side is hidden from us ..... he never overlooks a mistake, or makes the smallest allowance for ignorance."
(He doesn't let you resign and start again, either.)
(He doesn't let you resign and start again, either.)
-
Thomas Rendle
- Posts: 533
- Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2010 8:31 am
Re: IMO Andrew Dearnley
I think 'if you move the Rook on h8 I won't take it' would probably be enough for me!John Clarke wrote: ↑Thu Dec 25, 2025 9:14 amMaybe Andrew sent a convincing "conditional" with his 23rd move?
Re: IMO Andrew Dearnley
I think probably up to 5...b5 (Ulvestad), which then transposed into a Fritz (5...Nd4) line. Not sure how much after that was theory or previous praxis; I'd have to dig out my notes (from a pile of cardboard folders). But anyway, nowadays I'd play 6...Nxd5.Christopher Kreuzer wrote: ↑Wed Dec 24, 2025 10:03 pmWas this a tournament where the first few moves were pre-determined, and how many of those moves in this case? Do we have more moves, or do correspondence players stop at the point that the win becomes more obvious than in OTB chess?
No, no more moves. I assume I resigned because Black is basically a rook down. I note that Stockfish 2025 has White at +4.4
blog inspired by Bronstein's book, but using my own games: http://200opengames.blogspot.co.uk/