Millionaire Chess 6-10 October 2016
-
Leonard Barden
- Posts: 2043
- Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 11:21 am
Re: Millionaire Chess 6-10 October 2016
Gawain Jones will have a real opportunity on Millionaire Monday.
Last night's tiebreaks eliminated Xiong and Mamedov who were probably his most dangerous rivals and left the Englishman as the highest rated survivor against Swiercz, Cordova and Zhou.
Last night's tiebreaks eliminated Xiong and Mamedov who were probably his most dangerous rivals and left the Englishman as the highest rated survivor against Swiercz, Cordova and Zhou.
-
LawrenceCooper
- Posts: 8662
- Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 8:13 am
Re: Millionaire Chess 6-10 October 2016
I think that Swiercz beat Mamedov in a tie-break play-off but am only basing this on the pgn file and them playing in rounds 6 & 7. 
-
LawrenceCooper
- Posts: 8662
- Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 8:13 am
-
Barry Sandercock
- Posts: 1356
- Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2012 10:52 am
Re: Millionaire Chess 6-10 October 2016
Gawain Jones game looking interesting (move 18 ) fairly even but white ( Jones) looks promising.
-
LawrenceCooper
- Posts: 8662
- Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 8:13 am
Re: Millionaire Chess 6-10 October 2016
Gawain 1up albeit that doesn't tell the whole storyBarry Sandercock wrote:Gawain Jones game looking interesting (move 18 ) fairly even but white ( Jones) looks promising.
-
NickFaulks
- Posts: 9255
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 1:28 pm
Re: Millionaire Chess 6-10 October 2016
I thought it was a legitimate rapidplay win.
If you want a picture of the future, imagine a QR code stamped on a human face — forever.
-
Chris Rice
- Posts: 3457
- Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2012 5:17 am
Re: Millionaire Chess 6-10 October 2016
Gawain was completely busted but isn't this at least the fourth time in this tournament he's dug out a result he really shouldn't have got?
-
LawrenceCooper
- Posts: 8662
- Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 8:13 am
Re: Millionaire Chess 6-10 October 2016
A very important quality to have in this type of event.Chris Rice wrote:Gawain was completely busted but isn't this at least the fourth time in this tournament he's dug out a result he really shouldn't have got?
- Christopher Kreuzer
- Posts: 10803
- Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 2:34 am
- Location: London
Re: Millionaire Chess 6-10 October 2016
Deserves to have won for having the gumption to play on with 33.Kg2 instead of taking the perpetual at that point. And his opponent also declined a perpetual, but walked into a nice tactic that lost his queen.
-
Tim Harding
- Posts: 2381
- Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 8:46 pm
- Location: Dublin, Ireland
- Contact:
Re: Millionaire Chess 6-10 October 2016
I agree with those last comments. Gawain has maybe got the hang of the delay system better than his opponents. It seems to pay off on risk-taking compared with increments which reward "proper" play?Christopher Kreuzer wrote:Deserves to have won for having the gumption to play on with 33.Kg2 instead of taking the perpetual at that point. And his opponent also declined a perpetual, but walked into a nice tactic that lost his queen.
Tim Harding
Historian and FIDE Arbiter
Author of 'Steinitz in London,' British Chess Literature to 1914', 'Joseph Henry Blackburne: A Chess Biography', and 'Eminent Victorian Chess Players'
http://www.chessmail.com
Historian and FIDE Arbiter
Author of 'Steinitz in London,' British Chess Literature to 1914', 'Joseph Henry Blackburne: A Chess Biography', and 'Eminent Victorian Chess Players'
http://www.chessmail.com
-
John Moore
- Posts: 2361
- Joined: Wed May 14, 2008 6:33 pm
Re: Millionaire Chess 6-10 October 2016
The website is rubbish, though.
-
Jonathan Rogers
- Posts: 5105
- Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2008 9:26 pm
Re: Millionaire Chess 6-10 October 2016
yes, credit for courage in playing on with Kg2 there. it is a human game, not a computer one, and Gawain is obviously reading his opponent and the clock situation well.
It rather seems that he is destined to win it! What's the first prize - presumably not actually one million dollars?
It rather seems that he is destined to win it! What's the first prize - presumably not actually one million dollars?
-
NickFaulks
- Posts: 9255
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 1:28 pm
Re: Millionaire Chess 6-10 October 2016
$30k, bit of a comedown. That would explain why the US BIg Three preferred IoM.Jonathan Rogers wrote: It rather seems that he is destined to win it! What's the first prize - presumably not actually one million dollars?
If you want a picture of the future, imagine a QR code stamped on a human face — forever.
-
Jonathan Rogers
- Posts: 5105
- Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2008 9:26 pm
Re: Millionaire Chess 6-10 October 2016
I wonder whether any British player apart from Adams and Short has won 30K in one event before? (maybe Luke at one of the London Chess Classic events?)
-
Tim Harding
- Posts: 2381
- Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 8:46 pm
- Location: Dublin, Ireland
- Contact:
Re: Millionaire Chess 6-10 October 2016
Partly. Wesley So won the first one and Nakamura last year. I am not sure what first prize was, maybe 100,000 bucks each time? I don't think Caruana played in 2014 and he certainly didn't last year.NickFaulks wrote:$30k, bit of a comedown. That would explain why the US BIg Three preferred IoM.Jonathan Rogers wrote: It rather seems that he is destined to win it! What's the first prize - presumably not actually one million dollars?
Tim Harding
Historian and FIDE Arbiter
Author of 'Steinitz in London,' British Chess Literature to 1914', 'Joseph Henry Blackburne: A Chess Biography', and 'Eminent Victorian Chess Players'
http://www.chessmail.com
Historian and FIDE Arbiter
Author of 'Steinitz in London,' British Chess Literature to 1914', 'Joseph Henry Blackburne: A Chess Biography', and 'Eminent Victorian Chess Players'
http://www.chessmail.com