You can already see results in full.
http://www.englishchess.org.uk/county-c ... -20122013/
Essex v Norfolk in the Minor Counties is being played on Sunday: the Essex U160 and U120 matches were played on Saturday but have not yet been submitted.Are some of the fixtures being played tomorrow, or are some of them just not submitted yet?
I see there are 3 missing Bedfordshire players in their Minor result, so wonder whyChristopher Kreuzer wrote:Some of the quarter-finals were played today. Nice to see the results service working so well:
http://www.englishchess.org.uk/county-c ... -20122013/
Are some of the fixtures being played tomorrow, or are some of them just not submitted yet?
Perhaps the software can't handle people without grading codes?Mick Norris wrote:I see there are 3 missing Bedfordshire players in their Minor result, so wonder whyChristopher Kreuzer wrote:Some of the quarter-finals were played today. Nice to see the results service working so well:
http://www.englishchess.org.uk/county-c ... -20122013/
Are some of the fixtures being played tomorrow, or are some of them just not submitted yet?
Someone with a grading code, but no current grade might have the same effect. There's an average grading restriction in the Minor Counties, so an estimate would be needed.Richard Bates wrote: Perhaps the software can't handle people without grading codes?
Somebody stupid couldn't work out how to add players not already assigned to a particular team.Mick Norris wrote:I see there are 3 missing Bedfordshire players in their Minor result, so wonder whyChristopher Kreuzer wrote:Some of the quarter-finals were played today. Nice to see the results service working so well:
http://www.englishchess.org.uk/county-c ... -20122013/
Are some of the fixtures being played tomorrow, or are some of them just not submitted yet?
Lots of defaulted matches too
It appears there was a short-term problem adding new names for about an hour last night. This seemed to resolve to itself. You may have been caught up with this, so you probably didn't go wrong at all.Kevin Williamson wrote: Somebody stupid couldn't work out how to add players not already assigned to a particular team.![]()
I've emailed Alex and no doubt he will tell me where I went wrong.
Thanks for providing me with that excuse, David. Let's go with thatDavid Gilbert wrote:It appears there was a short-term problem adding new names for about an hour last night. This seemed to resolve to itself. You may have been caught up with this, so you probably didn't go wrong at all.Kevin Williamson wrote: Somebody stupid couldn't work out how to add players not already assigned to a particular team.![]()
I've emailed Alex and no doubt he will tell me where I went wrong.
Staffordshire 6 Kent 10Christopher Kreuzer wrote:Still around six results to come in. Only three sections for which the full semi-final line-up is known:
Minor: Bedfordshire vs Hampshire and Lincolnshire vs Essex/Norfolk
U100: Essex vs Lancashire and Nottinghamshire vs Surrey
U120: Kent vs Warwickshire and Essex vs Staffordshire
U140: Lancashire/Shrophire vs Hampshire and Kent vs Yorkshire
U160: Kent/Lancashire vs Warwickshire and Yorkshire/Essex vs Nottinghamshire
U180: Cambridgeshire vs Middlesex and Lancashire vs Kent
Open: Staffordshire/Kent vs Middlesex and Lancashire vs Yorkshire/Surrey
Well done on your win Andrew. Perhaps we got a point deducted for being so badAndrew Stone wrote:The results page is now showing a penalty point for Warwickshire (meaning they only just made a positive score at 1-14) versus Middlesex, and also one for Somerset versus Lancashire. Anyone know what these penalties were for? Warks had a default but Somerset didn't.
The penalties are explained in the News section, above the tournament bracket, for each section.Andrew Stone wrote:The results page is now showing a penalty point for Warwickshire (meaning they only just made a positive score at 1-14) versus Middlesex, and also one for Somerset versus Lancashire. Anyone know what these penalties were for? Warks had a default but Somerset didn't.