2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
- Matt Mackenzie
- Posts: 6327
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:51 pm
- Location: Millom, Cumbria
Re: 2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
Where was this Trump endorsement by Magnus, I missed it?
"Set up your attacks so that when the fire is out, it isn't out!" (H N Pillsbury)
-
Andrew Bak
- Posts: 835
- Joined: Sun Jan 02, 2011 11:48 am
- Location: Bradford
- Contact:
Re: 2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/com ... _1_ranked/Matt Mackenzie wrote:Where was this Trump endorsement by Magnus, I missed it?
- Paolo Casaschi
- Posts: 1194
- Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 6:46 am
Re: 2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
Carlsen's opinion about who'll win the American presidential election looks as interesting to me as Trump's opinion about who'll win the candidates chess tournament.Matt Mackenzie wrote:Where was this Trump endorsement by Magnus, I missed it?
-
Mick Norris
- Posts: 11370
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 10:12 am
- Location: Bolton, Greater Manchester
Re: 2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
I didn't realise that Karjakin had never beaten Vishy before yesterday
Any postings on here represent my personal views
-
MartinCarpenter
- Posts: 3180
- Joined: Tue May 24, 2011 10:58 am
Re: 2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
Now that it is interesting - well done him
Have to slightly share (iirc) Dubov's comment on the live stream that he found elite GM's going 1 Nf3 d5 2 e3 slightly depressing, but what can they do?
-
Roger de Coverly
- Posts: 22608
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm
Re: 2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
The Karjakin game transposed to a line that Smyslov and Larsen (starting 1. b3) had played fifty years ago or more. The other idea might have been to play d4 and attempt to transpose into one of Kramnik's lethal Colle System positions. The line 1. Nf3 d5 2. c4 d4 followed by .. f6 is now considered strong for Black, and the e3 move order avoids it.MartinCarpenter wrote: Have to slightly share (iirc) Dubov's comment on the live stream that he found elite GM's going 1 Nf3 d5 2 e3 slightly depressing, but what can they do?
-
MartinCarpenter
- Posts: 3180
- Joined: Tue May 24, 2011 10:58 am
Re: 2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
Apologies for drifting this further off topic. That wasn't the pointMichael Farthing wrote:Past performance is no guarantee of future performance. Politicians can go down as well as up.MartinCarpenter wrote:Well, yes actually. Compare the historic standards of leadership in the two countries!
Look at how 'well' Russia has ended up being run historically and you'll quickly see that its entirely rational for someone in Russia to support Putin.
American politics hasn't been remotely perfect for while now but still..... Anyway Carlsen was clearly being entirely ironic
-
Mick Norris
- Posts: 11370
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 10:12 am
- Location: Bolton, Greater Manchester
Re: 2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
Starting with 1.Nf3 d5 2.e3!? Karjakin, not a bad theoretician himself, decided to circumvent most of Anand's preparation. As he pointed out himself, Karjakin had done something similar at the previous Candidates' Tournament against Anand, when he played a setup akin to this one but with d2-d4 included.
For what it's worth, with this result Anand is now the #2 Indian player, dropping below Pentala Harikrishna on the live ratings list. A historic development, if this remains the case!
After 13 years since his first game against the Indian legend, Sergey Karjakin finally got rid of what the Germans call Angstgegner. As it turned out, he had never ever managed beat Vishy Anand, whether it was classical, rapid, or blitz.
Any postings on here represent my personal views
-
Jonathan Bryant
- Posts: 3452
- Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 3:54 pm
Re: 2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
Jonathan Bryant wrote: Today against Caruana Vishy went 5 c3, which later transposed back into his earlier game. Avoding prep, presumably, but since he obviously had something lined up for 5 ... Nd4 why not play it against Caruana?
Well judging from Anand - Nakamura today, the answer to the question "What did Vishy have up his sleeve for 1 e4 e5, 2 Nf3 Nc6, 3 Bb5 Nf6, 4 d3 Bc5, 5 0-0 Nd4 is "bugger all".
Unusual choice from Nak in reply, mind. Perhaps Anand wasn’t ready for ... a6 and ... b5
The Abysmal Depths of Chess: https://theabysmaldepthsofchess.blogspot.com
-
LawrenceCooper
- Posts: 8664
- Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 8:13 am
Re: 2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
Anand-Nakamura has ended in perpetual check.
- JustinHorton
- Posts: 10481
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:06 am
- Location: Somewhere you're not
Re: 2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
The computers don't think Aronian has nearly enough for his pawns against Caruana and I'm not seeing any reason to disagree.
"Do you play chess?"
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
-
Jonathan Bryant
- Posts: 3452
- Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 3:54 pm
Re: 2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
Yup. I was wondering why Naka would play ... h6 and then after g5 hxg5, Qxg5 the penny dropped.LawrenceCooper wrote:Anand-Nakamura has ended in perpetual check.
Idle ill-informed speculation - Vishy will abandon 4 d3 in the Berlin for the rest of the tournament having got zilch out of the opening with it three times out of three.
The Abysmal Depths of Chess: https://theabysmaldepthsofchess.blogspot.com
-
LawrenceCooper
- Posts: 8664
- Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 8:13 am
Re: 2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
Strange game. When he got in the thematic 20 e5 followed by f5 I thought he was doing well but the computers seemed to think it was nothing special and I suspect there was a big miscalculation somewhere as the Ne4/Bc1/d6 sequence seemed to only help black.JustinHorton wrote:The computers don't think Aronian has nearly enough for his pawns against Caruana and I'm not seeing any reason to disagree.
- JustinHorton
- Posts: 10481
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:06 am
- Location: Somewhere you're not
Re: 2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
Well Caruana was convinced enough, they've agreed a draw.
"Do you play chess?"
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
- JustinHorton
- Posts: 10481
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:06 am
- Location: Somewhere you're not
Re: 2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
(Chess24 haven't got it yet, but that's what the Worldchess site says.)
"Do you play chess?"
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."