39th Olympiad Khanty-Mansiysk 2010 (the chess)

The very latest International round up of English news.
Alex Holowczak
Posts: 9308
Joined: Sat May 30, 2009 5:18 pm
Location: Oldbury, Worcestershire
Contact:

Re: 39th Olympiad Khanty-Mansiysk 2010 (the chess)

Post by Alex Holowczak » Thu Sep 23, 2010 5:23 pm

Turkey with white on odds in the Open tomorrow. Should be winnable. Tough one for the women, an upfloat white on evens against Argentina.

User avatar
David Brock
Posts: 117
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 11:12 am
Contact:

Re: 39th Olympiad Khanty-Mansiysk 2010 (the chess)

Post by David Brock » Thu Sep 23, 2010 5:49 pm

I think it is a good draw for tommorrow they should be encouraged with a good nights sleep and a will to win they should squeeze at least 3 points out of tommorrows game. I would also stick with Gawain and rest either Luke or David what do you think?
Think,check and then Move !!

Matthew Turner
Posts: 3617
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 11:54 am

Re: 39th Olympiad Khanty-Mansiysk 2010 (the chess)

Post by Matthew Turner » Thu Sep 23, 2010 6:01 pm

Odds on Short resting tomorrow. He will have FIDE business, the match should be winnable without him and Adams will probably want to win with White to get some momentum

Alex Holowczak
Posts: 9308
Joined: Sat May 30, 2009 5:18 pm
Location: Oldbury, Worcestershire
Contact:

Re: 39th Olympiad Khanty-Mansiysk 2010 (the chess)

Post by Alex Holowczak » Thu Sep 23, 2010 6:08 pm

David Brock wrote:I think it is a good draw for tommorrow they should be encouraged with a good nights sleep and a will to win they should squeeze at least 3 points out of tommorrows game. I would also stick with Gawain and rest either Luke or David what do you think?
I think tomorrow is an opportunity for McShane and Adams to get some winning momentum. Howell just had a day off, so I'd put him in. So I have Adams, McShane and Howell so far. McShane lost with white today, so if I wanted to give him another go with white (which I would), then I'd pick Short so McShane could play white on 3. So I'd probably go for Adams, Short, McShane and Howell. It probably boils down to the players too, someone might want a rest more than others.

James Coleman
Posts: 384
Joined: Fri Nov 21, 2008 7:11 pm

Re: 39th Olympiad Khanty-Mansiysk 2010 (the chess)

Post by James Coleman » Thu Sep 23, 2010 6:13 pm

My money would be on McShane resting, mainly as Short's rested once already. Jones is playing well, and Turkey are definitely good enough to cause us problems if we are not at our best.

benedgell
Posts: 1261
Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2007 12:43 pm
Location: Somerset
Contact:

Re: 39th Olympiad Khanty-Mansiysk 2010 (the chess)

Post by benedgell » Thu Sep 23, 2010 6:47 pm

Hampshire- based Ugandan Steven Kawuma with a very decent win against a gm today.

Mark Howitt
Posts: 829
Joined: Sat Nov 22, 2008 8:20 pm
Contact:

Re: 39th Olympiad Khanty-Mansiysk 2010 (the chess)

Post by Mark Howitt » Thu Sep 23, 2010 7:27 pm

In theory we should play our strongest team. The only change I would be possibly tempted to make is Jones for Howell- as Jones does seem to be good at beating lower rated players and seems to be in quite good form. It's a match we can't afford to be complacent about at all- I think we will need either Adams, Short, McShane and Howell or Adams, Short, McShane and Jones to win- and all players must be performing to at least 90% of their capabilities.

It really is silly about this concept of 'resting' players. I think it's only arisen because of there being five people in the team, and wanting to play everyone and treating everyone 'fairly'. Reality is there's a game tomorrow, then another game, then a rest day. Can't even argue so far that the team have been drained by playing super hard opponents- Malayasia and South Africa should be easy wins for England!

LozCooper

Re: 39th Olympiad Khanty-Mansiysk 2010 (the chess)

Post by LozCooper » Fri Sep 24, 2010 5:30 am

Round 4 board pairings:

Turkey (TUR) Rtg 0 : 0
18.1 GM Adams Michael 2728 - IM Esen Baris 2538
18.2 GM Short Nigel D 2690 - GM Haznedaroglu Kivanc 2483
18.3 GM McShane Luke J 2657 - IM Yilmaz Mustafa 2482
18.4 GM Howell David W L 2616 - IM Erdogdu Mert 2428

28 Argentina (ARG) Rtg - 39 England (ENG) Rtg 0 : 0
26.1 IM Lujan Carolina 2312 - IM Houska Jovanka 2426
26.2 WGM Amura Claudia 2329 - WFM Grigoryan Meri 2099
26.3 WIM Plazaola Maria De Los Angeles 2203 - Bhatia Kanwal K 2072
26.4 Fernandez Maria Florencia 2119 - WFM Hegarty Sarah N 2084

User avatar
David Brock
Posts: 117
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 11:12 am
Contact:

Re: 39th Olympiad Khanty-Mansiysk 2010 (the chess)

Post by David Brock » Fri Sep 24, 2010 9:06 am

Well now they are playing all of the big boys I expect us to score at least 4-0.

Good luck to the boys later and heres to bashing the Turks!!
Think,check and then Move !!

Alan Walton
Posts: 1453
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2009 8:33 pm
Location: Oldham

Re: 39th Olympiad Khanty-Mansiysk 2010 (the chess)

Post by Alan Walton » Fri Sep 24, 2010 9:23 am

Mark Howitt wrote:Can't even argue so far that the team have been drained by playing super hard opponents- Malayasia and South Africa should be easy wins for England!
Once you play players whose ratings are over 2300 there are never easy wins, players are expected to win, but in reality it is never that easy

And although the team did win against S Africa, the players wouldn't have gone into the game thinking it is easy, and I remember Luke's opponent from Gibraltar a couple of years ago and he seem then a young and dangerous player who has improved over that last year or so

John Philpott

Re: 39th Olympiad Khanty-Mansiysk 2010 (the chess)

Post by John Philpott » Fri Sep 24, 2010 12:48 pm

Alan Walton wrote
Once you play players whose ratings are over 2300 there are never easy wins
Erdogdu-Howell did not look like the hardest win David has ever had!

Ian Kingston
Posts: 1072
Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2007 3:16 pm
Location: Sutton Coldfield
Contact:

Re: 39th Olympiad Khanty-Mansiysk 2010 (the chess)

Post by Ian Kingston » Fri Sep 24, 2010 12:55 pm

John Philpott wrote:Alan Walton wrote
Once you play players whose ratings are over 2300 there are never easy wins
Erdogdu-Howell did not look like the hardest win David has ever had!
Quite funny though.

User avatar
John Saunders
Posts: 2163
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2007 3:10 pm
Location: Kingston-upon-Thames
Contact:

Re: 39th Olympiad Khanty-Mansiysk 2010 (the chess)

Post by John Saunders » Fri Sep 24, 2010 2:18 pm

Carlsen looks dead lost against Jobava.
Personal Twitter @johnchess
Britbase https://www.britbase.info
(I prefer email to PM - contact me via this link - https://www.saund.org.uk/email.html)

Michael Jones
Posts: 642
Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 12:37 pm

Re: 39th Olympiad Khanty-Mansiysk 2010 (the chess)

Post by Michael Jones » Fri Sep 24, 2010 2:37 pm

Carlsen has a habit of drawing dead lost positions so I wouldn't say it's over yet, but it certainly looks promising for white. Norway look lost on board 4 as well.

Nepomniachtchi vs Sasikiran was a nice finish.

Oh, Carlsen's lost, and Polgar beat Bu Xiangzhi. McShane is definitely winning.

Ola Winfridsson
Posts: 324
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 12:26 pm

Re: 39th Olympiad Khanty-Mansiysk 2010 (the chess)

Post by Ola Winfridsson » Fri Sep 24, 2010 3:37 pm

benedgell wrote:Hampshire- based Ugandan Steven Kawuma with a very decent win against a gm today.
I think you may have misread the table. According to Chess Results Kawuma lost to Peralta (he won in round two against the Seychelles).
Mark Howitt wrote:It really is silly about this concept of 'resting' players. I think it's only arisen because of there being five people in the team, and wanting to play everyone and treating everyone 'fairly'. Reality is there's a game tomorrow, then another game, then a rest day. Can't even argue so far that the team have been drained by playing super hard opponents- Malayasia and South Africa should be easy wins for England!
I would argue exactly the opposite, there's every reason to rest players regardless of whether there's a rest day or not in a couple of days. It's all individual as well: some players prefer to take rest to recover mentally after a bad loss, others want to get straight back into the saddle. Some are perhaps better rested just because the opposition is on the weakish side, and they may have a tendency to be careless against that type of opposition, etc. etc. Those permutations are endless, and should a team member fall ill later, I'm not sure it such a good idea to have to bung in a reserve who may have played only a couple of games in the last 5-7 rounds, especially if you're facing one of the top teams.

Post Reply