Page 1 of 1

Anish Sarkar

Posted: Fri Nov 01, 2024 3:53 pm
by Paul McKeown
Just added to the FIDE Rating List: Anish Sarkar, aged 3 years 8 months and 19 days.

Re: Anish Sarkar

Posted: Fri Nov 01, 2024 3:55 pm
by John Upham
Paul McKeown wrote: ↑
Fri Nov 01, 2024 3:53 pm
Just added to the FIDE Rating List: Anish Sarkar, aged 3 years 8 months and 19 days.
1555 !

I am tempted to quote Victor Meldrew :D

Re: Anish Sarkar

Posted: Fri Nov 01, 2024 4:02 pm
by NickFaulks
Paul McKeown wrote: ↑
Fri Nov 01, 2024 3:53 pm
Just added to the FIDE Rating List: Anish Sarkar, aged 3 years 8 months and 19 days.
Presumably he kept a game score. Our son represented his primary school in a tournament when he was three and played respectable games, but writing the moves would have been an issue.

Re: Anish Sarkar

Posted: Fri Nov 01, 2024 5:10 pm
by Ian Thompson
NickFaulks wrote: ↑
Fri Nov 01, 2024 4:02 pm
Paul McKeown wrote: ↑
Fri Nov 01, 2024 3:53 pm
Just added to the FIDE Rating List: Anish Sarkar, aged 3 years 8 months and 19 days.
Presumably he kept a game score.
He could have got an assistant to do that. The question for the arbiter is whether the reason counts as a "disability" within the rules.

Re: Anish Sarkar

Posted: Fri Nov 01, 2024 5:48 pm
by LawrenceCooper
Ian Thompson wrote: ↑
Fri Nov 01, 2024 5:10 pm
NickFaulks wrote: ↑
Fri Nov 01, 2024 4:02 pm
Paul McKeown wrote: ↑
Fri Nov 01, 2024 3:53 pm
Just added to the FIDE Rating List: Anish Sarkar, aged 3 years 8 months and 19 days.
Presumably he kept a game score.
He could have got an assistant to do that. The question for the arbiter is whether the reason counts as a "disability" within the rules.
I had to ask a world schools organiser once about a 5 year old English player who wasn't confident notating and was told that he must do so to the best of his ability.

Re: Anish Sarkar

Posted: Fri Nov 01, 2024 7:08 pm
by Matt Mackenzie
A five year old may be barely literate, less likely for someone who is three and a half.

Re: Anish Sarkar

Posted: Fri Nov 01, 2024 9:10 pm
by NickFaulks
Matt Mackenzie wrote: ↑
Fri Nov 01, 2024 7:08 pm
A five year old may be barely literate, less likely for someone who is three and a half.
It's not so much literacy as being physically able to write.

I found the great thing about teaching chess to very young children is that they are capable of quite deep ideas but are not so good at expressing them. Moving differently shaped lumps of wood around is an early skill - in today's world, of course, touchscreens work really well!

Re: Anish Sarkar

Posted: Sat Nov 02, 2024 6:21 pm
by Roger Lancaster
At Watford, our youngest player will be 5 early next year. She has played only 8 classical games so far (plus, of course, a larger number of rapidplay games) which isn't enough for a rating - she'll likely get one at the end of November - but keeping score hasn't been much of a problem. Getting anywhere near a 1555 rating may be more difficult.

Re: Anish Sarkar

Posted: Sun Nov 03, 2024 12:09 pm
by Neil Graham
There is plenty in the Indian Press about Anish.

For example see https://www.dynamitenews.com/story/kolk ... in-history

Re: Anish Sarkar

Posted: Tue Dec 02, 2025 4:05 pm
by LawrenceCooper
Neil Graham wrote: ↑
Sun Nov 03, 2024 12:09 pm
There is plenty in the Indian Press about Anish.

For example see https://www.dynamitenews.com/story/kolk ... in-history
He's a veteran compared to this player: https://www.etvbharat.com/en/bharat/ind ... vaUCoWpNZA

Re: Anish Sarkar

Posted: Tue Dec 02, 2025 6:01 pm
by Pete Morriss
LawrenceCooper wrote: ↑
Tue Dec 02, 2025 4:05 pm

He's a veteran compared to this player: https://www.etvbharat.com/en/bharat/ind ... vaUCoWpNZA
Maybe relevant to this is the following from Shaun Press (QC Secretary) on his blog today:
I received a request to certify a player as the youngest ever player to get a rapid rating. 'Nope, not doing it' was basically my reply, as (a) this is something FIDE does not do and (b) such records are exploitative.