"Winning" by Nigel Short
-
- Posts: 5833
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 12:28 pm
"Winning" by Nigel Short
The title says it all. Nigel presents all the games from eight tournaments in which he came first or equal first, ranging from Wijk aan Zee 1987 to Anzali 2016. Apart from a few lifeless drawn games, all the games are annotated, some in depth, with plenty of diagrams. The titles for each chapter come from music titles, which fit the event in some way. “We Are The Champions” and “A Hard Day’s Night” gave that away, although I had to look up a couple of them. He gives information on opponents and venues, which is interesting as some of the former were just names to me. He does make it clear when he thinks the organization could have been improved. He can be a bit blunt at times, but I don’t have a problem with that. I think the annotations are honest, he’s not afraid to criticize himself, or praise his opponent. Many “Best Game” books are written as if the author is a genius who saw every possibility. Of course, this is not best games per se, but best tournaments. He comments that he has a poor record against Judit Polgar, which will doubtless annoy his detractors. He also urges that you should practise, analyse your own games as soon as possible, and learn endings, all of which will help you improve. I have not had time to study this book properly, but I am sure it will be rewarding. Just to mention one tournament in particular, Amsterdam 1991, ended 1st Short and Salov, 6/9, 3rd= Karpov and Kasparov 5.5, 5th Korchnoi 4.5 etc., where Nigel drew with Karpov with black in the last round. You have to be impressed with that!
-
- Posts: 5249
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 5:56 pm
- Location: Croydon
Re: "Winning" by Nigel Short
Kevin Thurlow wrote: ↑Thu Jul 22, 2021 8:09 pm[Nigel Short] can be a bit blunt at times, but I don’t have a problem with that.
-
- Posts: 5833
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 12:28 pm
Re: "Winning" by Nigel Short
":!: "
Fair comment.
Fair comment.
-
- Posts: 10364
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:06 am
- Location: Somewhere you're not
Re: "Winning" by Nigel Short
I've not read the book but I did read the excerpt that was posted on this forum and which exhibited two frequent characteristics of his writing. One of these is a kind of laboured English which I find a pain to read and the other was the recourse to personal feuds and grudges which I think became tiresome a long time ago: the appeal is only in a pulling-wings-off-flies kind of way.
I was very pleased when New In Chess terminated his column, at least in so far as it spared me my annual dilemma as to whether I should renew my subscription.
I was very pleased when New In Chess terminated his column, at least in so far as it spared me my annual dilemma as to whether I should renew my subscription.
"Do you play chess?"
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
lostontime.blogspot.com
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
lostontime.blogspot.com
-
- Posts: 1008
- Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 11:51 am
Re: "Winning" by Nigel Short
Nigel admits in the introduction that every book with his name on the cover - apart from one on the French Defence - had been ghost-written. The following paragraph proves that this one is all his own work.
As someone with a casual interest in military history, I was hoping to emulate the victory of my hero, Arthur Wellesley, Marquess Wellington – as he then was styled before his ducal promotion – at the 1813 Siege of Pamplona, during the Peninsular War. The credit for the French surrender properly belongs to the Spanish commanders, Captain General Enrique Jose O’Donnell and Major General Carlos de Espana, but I never allow vulgar facts to spoil a narrative. It was at least a shared British win, and that would more than suffice for inspiration.
-
- Posts: 1915
- Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2015 2:44 pm
Re: "Winning" by Nigel Short
"Marquess of Wellington".Gerard Killoran wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 5:16 pmNigel admits in the introduction that every book with his name on the cover - apart from one on the French Defence - had been ghost-written. The following paragraph proves that this one is all his own work.
As someone with a casual interest in military history, I was hoping to emulate the victory of my hero, Arthur Wellesley, Marquess Wellington – as he then was styled before his ducal promotion – at the 1813 Siege of Pamplona, during the Peninsular War. The credit for the French surrender properly belongs to the Spanish commanders, Captain General Enrique Jose O’Donnell and Major General Carlos de Espana, but I never allow vulgar facts to spoil a narrative. It was at least a shared British win, and that would more than suffice for inspiration.
-
- Posts: 1008
- Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 11:51 am
Re: "Winning" by Nigel Short
Surely 'ducal elevation' would be your actual correct styling, rather than the ever so vulgar 'promotion'?Roger Lancaster wrote: ↑Tue Jul 27, 2021 6:41 am"Marquess of Wellington".Gerard Killoran wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 5:16 pmNigel admits in the introduction that every book with his name on the cover - apart from one on the French Defence - had been ghost-written. The following paragraph proves that this one is all his own work.
As someone with a casual interest in military history, I was hoping to emulate the victory of my hero, Arthur Wellesley, Marquess Wellington – as he then was styled before his ducal promotion – at the 1813 Siege of Pamplona, during the Peninsular War. The credit for the French surrender properly belongs to the Spanish commanders, Captain General Enrique Jose O’Donnell and Major General Carlos de Espana, but I never allow vulgar facts to spoil a narrative. It was at least a shared British win, and that would more than suffice for inspiration.
-
- Posts: 7218
- Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2007 10:29 am
- Location: Cove, Hampshire, England.
Re: "Winning" by Nigel Short
Nigel Short's Chess Skills was written by Malcolm Pein using contributions from Nigel.Gerard Killoran wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 5:16 pmNigel admits in the introduction that every book with his name on the cover - apart from one on the French Defence - had been ghost-written. The following paragraph proves that this one is all his own work.
Nigel Short Chess Prodigy was written by David Short.
It would appear that many of the rip-off books supposedly written by Nigel were sourced from Malcolm's book appearing under various guises.
Last edited by John Upham on Tue Jul 27, 2021 3:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
British Chess News : britishchessnews.com
Twitter: @BritishChess
Facebook: facebook.com/groups/britishchess
Twitter: @BritishChess
Facebook: facebook.com/groups/britishchess
-
- Posts: 5237
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:51 pm
- Location: Millom, Cumbria
Re: "Winning" by Nigel Short
As the front cover of the latter makes clear, plus numerous very readable contributions by George Botterill.
"Set up your attacks so that when the fire is out, it isn't out!" (H N Pillsbury)
-
- Posts: 1523
- Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2016 4:15 pm
Re: "Winning" by Nigel Short
I tend to agree with Justin about the NIC column. You could not pay me enough to read an anthology of Short's magazine articles.JustinHorton wrote: ↑Sat Jul 24, 2021 8:04 amI've not read the book but I did read the excerpt that was posted on this forum and which exhibited two frequent characteristics of his writing. One of these is a kind of laboured English which I find a pain to read and the other was the recourse to personal feuds and grudges which I think became tiresome a long time ago: the appeal is only in a pulling-wings-off-flies kind of way.
I was very pleased when New In Chess terminated his column, at least in so far as it spared me my annual dilemma as to whether I should renew my subscription.
I bought the book anyway and am enjoying it so far, these things less of an issue in annotated games.
He comments he hopes to release a second volume including his matches. I very much hope he uses the Kasparov match as the centrepiece and calls the book "Losing"
-
- Posts: 5249
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 5:56 pm
- Location: Croydon
Re: "Winning" by Nigel Short
I made that very suggestion to him at the KIA Oval, albeit without the apparent malice.Paul Cooksey wrote: ↑Fri Jul 30, 2021 6:12 pmI very much hope he uses the Kasparov match as the centrepiece and calls the book "Losing".
https://twitter.com/DavidSedgwickIA/sta ... 2916681728
-
- Posts: 1295
- Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 11:12 pm
Re: "Winning" by Nigel Short
The Oval is sufficient I think. In this case be more traditional.
-
- Posts: 5249
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 5:56 pm
- Location: Croydon
Re: "Winning" by Nigel Short
Sponsors are important.J T Melsom wrote: ↑Fri Jul 30, 2021 8:10 pmThe Oval is sufficient I think. In this case be more traditional.
-
- Posts: 413
- Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2010 10:35 pm
- Location: Nottingham
Re: "Winning" by Nigel Short
KIA Oval = King's Indian Attack Oval?!David Sedgwick wrote: ↑Fri Jul 30, 2021 6:28 pmI made that very suggestion to him at the KIA Oval, albeit without the apparent malice.Paul Cooksey wrote: ↑Fri Jul 30, 2021 6:12 pmI very much hope he uses the Kasparov match as the centrepiece and calls the book "Losing".
https://twitter.com/DavidSedgwickIA/sta ... 2916681728
-
- Posts: 1295
- Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 11:12 pm
Re: "Winning" by Nigel Short
Agree, but I doubt many Surrey members reference the sponsor in general conversation. That's certainly true of those I know.David Sedgwick wrote: ↑Fri Jul 30, 2021 11:57 pmSponsors are important.J T Melsom wrote: ↑Fri Jul 30, 2021 8:10 pmThe Oval is sufficient I think. In this case be more traditional.