English Chess Forum

AlanLlewellyn wrote: ↑

Tue Aug 30, 2022 12:17 am

all i have done is make public that they put up a computer miss-use notice

While i have been a club champion of the small club called Ulverston (birth place of Stan Laurel of Laurel and Hardy fame), my chess successes have been long and far between. In 1995 I was runner up in my county in England equivalent of a state in USA though slightly smaller. I followed it up with a 3rd in an under 2000 fide equivalent tourney. I seemed to be going places but it wasn't until 2012 that I entered a proper international tournament- the Welsh Championships Open and got 4 draws and lost against three superb juniors to finish with 2/7. In 2013 I entered the British Championship Open and got 3/11. 2014 saw me enter the Isle of Man Masters- a top tournament but I got soundly beaten every game to finish with just a bye and eight loses (ie 1/9). 2014 also saw the height of my achievements so far in the super rapidplay London classic top international tournament where i achieved 4/10 with no byes. to put it in perspective ex world number 5 jon speelman only got 7/10.
i recently tried to get in the northumbrian masters but they adjudged me not good enough.

I have beaten vallez poms 3 - 2 in 15 minute chess online, he is a 2700 fide player and i am 1 - 1 with grandmaster keith arkell again online. my best result in a proper rated game is a draw against a 2136 fide rated shami abdulleyev but i haven't played many very strong players.

no what i am saying is they wear temperature sensitive glasses and can see the physical reaction caused by the concept of conservation of energy which predicts that something destroyed even an idea takes energy to destroy and as perfect play is drawn the best move leads to less destruction hence as energy remains at zero everywhere and destroying something takes greater energy than constructing it, the energy in constructing the perfect game is less thus the temperature is less

John Upham wrote: ↑

Wed Aug 31, 2022 10:44 am

One of my favourites:

no what i am saying is they wear temperature sensitive glasses and can see the physical reaction caused by the concept of conservation of energy which predicts that something destroyed even an idea takes energy to destroy and as perfect play is drawn the best move leads to less destruction hence as energy remains at zero everywhere and destroying something takes greater energy than constructing it, the energy in constructing the perfect game is less thus the temperature is less

Translate that if you dare!

AlanLlewellyn wrote: ↑

Wed Aug 31, 2022 10:55 am

John Upham wrote: ↑

Wed Aug 31, 2022 10:44 am

One of my favourites:

no what i am saying is they wear temperature sensitive glasses and can see the physical reaction caused by the concept of conservation of energy which predicts that something destroyed even an idea takes energy to destroy and as perfect play is drawn the best move leads to less destruction hence as energy remains at zero everywhere and destroying something takes greater energy than constructing it, the energy in constructing the perfect game is less thus the temperature is less

Translate that if you dare!

John if you destroy something you attract energy is what i was trying to say which is why stolen goods are declared hot(the police know this concept) and why truth detectors depend on temperature of the skin and why hell is hot and heaven cool.

AlanLlewellyn wrote: ↑

Wed Aug 31, 2022 10:55 am

John if you destroy something you attract energy is what i was trying to say which is why stolen goods are declared hot(the police know this concept) and why truth detectors depend on temperature of the skin and why hell is hot and heaven cool.