Boris Johnson

[Matt Mackenzie]

Worse than Truss?

Maybe not on a pro-rata basis, admittedly

Though there is a respectable argument that Cameron has done more long term harm than either of them.

[IM Jack Rudd]

Based on the rankings typically given to William H Harrison when historians rank US presidents, my guess will be that Truss will typically feature near the bottom of the UK prime ministerial rankings, but not at the bottom.

[Richard Thursby]

Though there is a respectable argument that Cameron has done more long term harm than either of them.

You could argue from that it was Blair and/or Brown that ultimately did that long-term harm. (Brown by not standing in 1994 that allowed Blair in and then events of 2003-2004).

[Matt Mackenzie]

Well it is probably truest to say that Cameron (the "heir to Blair", let us not forget) compounded the harm NL did in *some* areas whilst doing rather less of the good things that mitigated this. And his totally unscrupulous "evil twin" Osborne will truly go down in infamy - most current bad stuff has his fingerprints on it at some level. Its not surprising that things came to a head starting from the early 2010s.

[Joey Stewart]

It seems to be that almost all prime ministers over the last 20-30 years are simply the 'lesser evil' rather then someone who is expected to actually do something useful for the country