Pedants United
-
- Posts: 3199
- Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2013 2:30 pm
Re: Pedants United
It's an annoying phrase because it makes you wonder whether they know they are making a mistake or just following a trend.
-
- Posts: 8472
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 1:28 pm
Re: Pedants United
When I lived in Holland in the 1980s I was very envious of the ability of young people there to converse in languages other than their native Dutch. How could they not? Since before they could talk they had been watching Tom & Jerry on television, in English.David Sedgwick wrote: ↑Wed Jan 20, 2021 7:55 pmI have also found that young non-native speakers attribute their excellent English, or rather their excellent American, to watching American films.
If you want a picture of the future, imagine a QR code stamped on a human face — forever.
-
- Posts: 5837
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 12:28 pm
Re: Pedants United
"How could they not? Since before they could talk they had been watching Tom & Jerry on television, in English."
As a digression, the brilliant pianist Lang Lang actually imitates Tom when playing one piece (I think Liszt's Hungarian Rhapsody) as he watched "Cat Concerto" as a very young child.
I've encountered a number of Europeans who speak quite good English, but with American accents...
As a digression, the brilliant pianist Lang Lang actually imitates Tom when playing one piece (I think Liszt's Hungarian Rhapsody) as he watched "Cat Concerto" as a very young child.
I've encountered a number of Europeans who speak quite good English, but with American accents...
-
- Posts: 1758
- Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2008 8:52 pm
Re: Pedants United
As this is the place for pedants: They would not have learned much English from Tom & Jerry. The main characters seldom spoke and the humans seemed to be restricted to screams and calling out "Tom".
Bugs Bunny would have been a far better example to give!!
Bugs Bunny would have been a far better example to give!!
Re: Pedants United
Sunday night on her regular LBC Radio slot the stumbling (when it comes to public speaking) sister of the UK's mumbling Prime Minister came up with -
"People are waiting for Joe Biden to pull the cat out of the bag."
Have public schools and Oxbridge been dumbing down?
"People are waiting for Joe Biden to pull the cat out of the bag."
Have public schools and Oxbridge been dumbing down?
-
- Posts: 8472
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 1:28 pm
Re: Pedants United
They're letting anyone in nowadays.
If you want a picture of the future, imagine a QR code stamped on a human face — forever.
-
- Posts: 5837
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 12:28 pm
Re: Pedants United
I don't have shares in redmolotov, this is purely for info...
https://www.redmolotov.com/the-pedants-revolt-tshirt
https://www.redmolotov.com/the-pedants-revolt-tshirt
-
- Posts: 555
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2010 5:51 pm
Re: Pedants United
A fine example of why the apostrophe should be carefully preserved. 'The Pedants' Revolt' title on the shirt tells us that more than one pedant is involved. Also without the apostrophe 'revolt' becomes a verb and the meaning is changed.Kevin Thurlow wrote: ↑Sat Jan 23, 2021 10:59 amI don't have shares in redmolotov, this is purely for info...
https://www.redmolotov.com/the-pedants-revolt-tshirt
I think there's a pedantic joke about the Revolt's leader, Wat Tyler, but I've forgotten the exact wording.
-
- Posts: 5837
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 12:28 pm
Re: Pedants United
"I think there's a pedantic joke about the Revolt's leader, Wat Tyler, but I've forgotten the exact wording."
Barry Cryer - "Who led the Pedants' Revolt? Which Tyler."
Barry Cryer - "Who led the Pedants' Revolt? Which Tyler."
-
- Posts: 1945
- Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 8:36 pm
Re: Pedants United
I've just had an e-mail from East Midlands Railway to "enter our new innovation contest".
-
- Posts: 555
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2010 5:51 pm
Re: Pedants United
Recent question in 'The Times' daily quiz (where I rarely get more than half marks): Who did Robert Greene (c 1558-92) call 'an upstart crow, beautified with our feathers'?
The first word of the question should surely be 'whom'. Is it gradually falling out of use? Needless to say, I rather like it and would preserve it.
Incidentally I didn't know the answer.
The first word of the question should surely be 'whom'. Is it gradually falling out of use? Needless to say, I rather like it and would preserve it.
Incidentally I didn't know the answer.
-
- Posts: 1212
- Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 11:35 am
Re: Pedants United
Are you sure about this?Paul Habershon wrote: ↑Sat Feb 06, 2021 8:20 amRecent question in 'The Times' daily quiz (where I rarely get more than half marks): Who did Robert Greene (c 1558-92) call 'an upstart crow, beautified with our feathers'?
The first word of the question should surely be 'whom'. Is it gradually falling out of use? Needless to say, I rather like it and would preserve it.
Incidentally I didn't know the answer.
Surely the subject of the sentence is the person referred to by Robert Greene, rather than Robert Greene himself, and so who should be used rather than whom.
Also, there seems to be a generally accepted rule that questions start with who rather than whom. The Cambridge Dictionary states in a discussion of "Who, whom" that "we use who as an interrogative pronoun to begin questions about people."
-
- Posts: 555
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2010 5:51 pm
Re: Pedants United
I'm standing my ground for the time being, Tim. Grammatically the main verb is 'did call' and the subject is Robert Greene, who did the calling. The interrogative pronoun 'who', beginning questions about people, would be correct if the question started 'Who is the person that Robert Greene called....'Tim Spanton wrote: ↑Sat Feb 06, 2021 8:55 amAre you sure about this?Paul Habershon wrote: ↑Sat Feb 06, 2021 8:20 amRecent question in 'The Times' daily quiz (where I rarely get more than half marks): Who did Robert Greene (c 1558-92) call 'an upstart crow, beautified with our feathers'?
The first word of the question should surely be 'whom'. Is it gradually falling out of use? Needless to say, I rather like it and would preserve it.
Incidentally I didn't know the answer.
Surely the subject of the sentence is the person referred to by Robert Greene, rather than Robert Greene himself, and so who should be used rather than whom.
Also, there seems to be a generally accepted rule that questions start with who rather than whom. The Cambridge Dictionary states in a discussion of "Who, whom" that "we use who as an interrogative pronoun to begin questions about people."
For Whom the Bell Tolls!
-
- Posts: 1139
- Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2011 6:33 pm
Re: Pedants United
I don't like 'whom', and think it truly antiquated, except after a preposition on occasion.
-
- Posts: 1026
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 4:45 pm
Re: Pedants United
Perhaps 'whom' could be antiqued, like some of those chess pieces you can buy from Chess and Bridge?