Pedants United
-
- Posts: 3199
- Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2013 2:30 pm
Re: Pedants United
The BBC made a bit of a thing out of it, much more so than his wife being caught in the act of dodging train fares on her way to court in Luton of all places.
-
- Posts: 3559
- Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2008 4:31 pm
- Location: Awbridge, Hampshire
Re: Pedants United
Was he right or wrong with his Brexit pronunciation?
-
- Posts: 3199
- Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2013 2:30 pm
Re: Pedants United
Not about right or wrong. Never was and never can be given that RP constitutes less than 3% of spoken English.
-
- Posts: 555
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2010 5:51 pm
Re: Pedants United
I return to the first item mentioned in the Pedant thread: misuse of lie, lay, lying, laying, laid, lain.
As though the royals aren't in enough trouble already, here is a remark from 'a female royal' to Meghan: 'Why don't you lay low for a while...?'
LIE, please!
As though the royals aren't in enough trouble already, here is a remark from 'a female royal' to Meghan: 'Why don't you lay low for a while...?'
LIE, please!
-
- Posts: 8472
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 1:28 pm
Re: Pedants United
Allegedly. The grammatical error be sufficient to show that the remark is invented.Paul Habershon wrote: ↑Tue Mar 09, 2021 12:43 pmAs though the royals aren't in enough trouble already, here is a remark from 'a female royal' to Meghan: 'Why don't you lay low for a while...?'
If you want a picture of the future, imagine a QR code stamped on a human face — forever.
-
- Posts: 5249
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 5:56 pm
- Location: Croydon
Re: Pedants United
I presume that you meant either "The grammatical error my be sufficient ..." or "The grammatical error is sufficient ...".NickFaulks wrote: ↑Tue Mar 09, 2021 4:49 pmThe grammatical error be sufficient to show that the remark is invented.
Well, this is the "Pedants United" thread.
-
- Posts: 555
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2010 5:51 pm
Re: Pedants United
Nick, it's just occurred to me that the remark may have been translated into American by Meghan. I don't know how the Americans view 'lie' and 'lay'.NickFaulks wrote: ↑Tue Mar 09, 2021 4:49 pmAllegedly. The grammatical error be sufficient to show that the remark is invented.Paul Habershon wrote: ↑Tue Mar 09, 2021 12:43 pmAs though the royals aren't in enough trouble already, here is a remark from 'a female royal' to Meghan: 'Why don't you lay low for a while...?'
In passing, perhaps the 'racist' royal remark about the skin colour of the unborn baby could be construed as 'I wonder if the baby will have Meghan's beautiful dark skin', much as it's usual to speculate about whether a baby may have its mother's lovely eyes (e.g.).
-
- Posts: 1838
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2011 12:16 am
Re: Pedants United
What 'racist' royal remark - 61 word statement.
American speculation.
Who is the 'a female royal'?
American speculation.
Who is the 'a female royal'?
-
- Posts: 3199
- Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2013 2:30 pm
Re: Pedants United
Paul Habershon wrote: ↑Tue Mar 09, 2021 12:43 pmI return to the first item mentioned in the Pedant thread: misuse of lie, lay, lying, laying, laid, lain.
As though the royals aren't in enough trouble already, here is a remark from 'a female royal' to Meghan: 'Why don't you lay low for a while...?'
LIE, please!
I think you might be stretching things a little there Paul. Although what you are saying can clearly be applied to written English, or so I think, I am not so sure it can be with oral/spoken English. If the sentiment expressed exists in the form of an utterance, as is sometimes the case, applying grammatical rules/points/patterns is very tricky because utterances don't follow the same linguistic conventions, particularly that of the subject-verb-object relationship/order.
However, to contradict myself I think whatshername may have slipped up using back shift incorrectly. Perhaps she omitted 'they said...' accidentally?
-
- Posts: 3199
- Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2013 2:30 pm
Re: Pedants United
What about the use of 'get' and 'be'? I just heard GM David Howell say 'he could get checked by the bishop' which to me sounds like an informal way of saying 'he could be/have been checked by the bishop'.
-
- Posts: 5249
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 5:56 pm
- Location: Croydon
Re: Pedants United
Greetings to all on Holy Saturday.
I am sure that all contributors to this thread will know that Easter Saturday is next Saturday.
I am sure that all contributors to this thread will know that Easter Saturday is next Saturday.
-
- Posts: 5249
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 5:56 pm
- Location: Croydon
Re: Pedants United
From an email which I have just sent to the members of the SCCU Executive Committee:
"It may just be I, as I am notoriously pedantic, ..."
"It may just be I, as I am notoriously pedantic, ..."
-
- Posts: 8472
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 1:28 pm
Re: Pedants United
Makes me sorry not to be on the circulation list.David Sedgwick wrote: ↑Sat Apr 03, 2021 12:44 pmFrom an email which I have just sent to the members of the SCCU Executive Committee:
"It may just be I, as I am notoriously pedantic, ..."
If you want a picture of the future, imagine a QR code stamped on a human face — forever.
-
- Posts: 5837
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 12:28 pm
Re: Pedants United
Reminds me of an extract from one of the Billy Bunter stories,
"Bunter, who stole those sausages?"
"It wasn't me, sir."
"It was not I, Bunter."
"I never said it was!"
(Laughter from the class.)
This is from memory and other foodstuffs are available.
"Bunter, who stole those sausages?"
"It wasn't me, sir."
"It was not I, Bunter."
"I never said it was!"
(Laughter from the class.)
This is from memory and other foodstuffs are available.
-
- Posts: 5837
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 12:28 pm
Re: Pedants United
"It may just be I, as I am notoriously pedantic, ..."
I wonder if anyone will dislike the split infinitive? If you change the word order, it gets worse.
Oh, all right, "order of the words", or I will be accused of using an adjectival noun.
I wonder if anyone will dislike the split infinitive? If you change the word order, it gets worse.
Oh, all right, "order of the words", or I will be accused of using an adjectival noun.