Post
by David Pardoe » Thu Jul 03, 2014 9:44 pm
Firstly...how to encourage a wider range of entries, and more counties to take part...I`ve made a few suggestions earlier (..and on other threads)..... .and let me emphasise that these are targeted at all groupings.
Too much focus in these discussions is about the top dogs...Open, U180 and Minor Counties teams.
We need to encourage the lower tier groups, i.e., U160, U140, U120 & U100 groupings, where more counties should consider taking part.
I`ve made some points on this, such as widening the grading boundaries back to 25 grading points. To compliment this and add balance to the grading representation, I`ve suggested having more structure within the grading boundaries, to ensure a better spread of players , i.e...its no good having all these grade groups just top loaded by the big hitter teams, which means that chunks of the players at the lower end of these bands get excluded from playing. One option might be to insert an averaging rule that says, for instance, that in the U180 section each team must field players averaging no more than 168 on the bottom eight boards. This would ensure that each team had at least 2 or 3 players in that lower quartile. Similarly, for the U140 section, you could insist that the lower eight boards must not average above 128... This would help with spreads, add balance, ensure wider player representation, reduce top loading, and open up the competitions, so that a greater number of counties are encouraged to join in...
This is not particularly aimed at incentivising our big mega counties, its about encouraging the wider county community to take up the challenge...
Another issue is about the switch between the qualifier stages and the National stages, and the problems/challenges that brings.. It could be that we need to look at the restructuring of the Finals stages
I particularly hope that the discussions open up to include County Captains, who probably know at first hand what actual issues are faced.
Combining the Semi-finals & Finals into one big Jamboree event, played over two days at Birmingham University might be a possibility...allowing teams to bring in different players for the two days if they wished.
This, for one thing, would allow the Preliminaries and Qtr Finals to be spread out over a longer period.
At the bottom of this, you need good organisation at all levels...Union, County and league/club...volunteers are key, and captains, with good contact lists and support from local clubs/players.
Maybe we also need to look at other issues, such as prizes, and publicity, to try to ensure that the regional Press give the Finals more coverage, with pictures and stories, background, news and games, for local interest across our regions. Counties and the ECF need to give this some attention if we are to attract new players into the game and help boost numbers at our local clubs.
I suspect that what is really needed is a fully detailed paper, listing various options, objectives, challenges, etc...to see what the various counties think. This could be presented at various AGMs and feedback taken.
A questionaire, calling for views on a whole range of options might also be worth doing...
BRING BACK THE BCF