Page 1 of 1
FIDE authorising use of 45/30 time control for norms
Posted: Fri Nov 13, 2026 1:11 pm
by LawrenceCooper
Re: FIDE authorising use of 45/30 time control for norms
Posted: Fri Nov 13, 2026 3:48 pm
by Matt Mackenzie
Predictable, but still not good.
Re: FIDE authorising use of 45/30 time control for norms
Posted: Fri Nov 13, 2026 6:05 pm
by Alex Holowczak
Federations have received a survey to fill in, which is currently being discussed and completed. I will certainly be reading people's thoughts here before making my contributions, so feel free to make them.

Re: FIDE authorising use of 45/30 time control for norms
Posted: Fri Nov 13, 2026 6:28 pm
by Roger de Coverly
Alex Holowczak wrote: ↑Fri Nov 13, 2026 6:05 pm
I will certainly be reading people's thoughts here before making my contributions, so feel free to make them.
If the ECF wants tournaments with three rounds in a day to be unconditionally rated, it needs to ask for the two games a day restriction to be removed for tournaments where Norm chances don't arise.
Does the USCF still have tournaments with three rounds in a single day? There certainly used to because that's where Stewart Reuben and perhaps others got the idea from.
Re: FIDE authorising use of 45/30 time control for norms
Posted: Fri Nov 13, 2026 6:29 pm
by IM Jack Rudd
It's authorized for norms, but the schedules that would make it sensible are not. Yay, joined-up thinking.
Re: FIDE authorising use of 45/30 time control for norms
Posted: Fri Nov 13, 2026 7:28 pm
by Paul McKeown
I believe I once came across a rather satirical description in German of an attempt to speed up chess in the early 20th century as "Dampfschach" - steam-driven chess. I can't remember who it was that used this word, but I am sure that they would approve of my condemnation of this unnecessary cheapening of the rating and title system using the same term.
Re: FIDE authorising use of 45/30 time control for norms
Posted: Fri Nov 13, 2026 7:48 pm
by Tim Spanton
60m with a 30s increment seems OK to me, although I prefer 90+30
Re: FIDE authorising use of 45/30 time control for norms
Posted: Fri Nov 13, 2026 7:49 pm
by Matt Mackenzie
There used to be quite a few English weekend congresses with a three round day (usually Saturday) but I think that has almost died out now.
Re: FIDE authorising use of 45/30 time control for norms
Posted: Fri Nov 13, 2026 8:02 pm
by Alex Holowczak
Matt Mackenzie wrote: ↑Fri Nov 13, 2026 7:49 pm
There used to be quite a few English weekend congresses with a three round day (usually Saturday) but I think that has almost died out now.
They are still going in places. Adam Raoof organises them with time limits of 60+30 in London. I organise some in Warwickshire, with a time limit of 80+10.
Re: FIDE authorising use of 45/30 time control for norms
Posted: Fri Nov 13, 2026 8:21 pm
by Roger de Coverly
Alex Holowczak wrote: ↑Fri Nov 13, 2026 8:02 pm
They are still going in places. Adam Raoof organises them with time limits of 60+30 in London. I organise some in Warwickshire, with a time limit of 80+10.
They are popular where a Friday evening round would be difficult. Witney, Kidlington and St Albans are examples where the move rate is 90 minutes + 15 seconds.
Derbyshire and the Somerset New Year are other examples. Essentially it's any 5 round tournament over two days.
Re: FIDE authorising use of 45/30 time control for norms
Posted: Fri Nov 13, 2026 8:40 pm
by Joey Stewart
I seen to remember such 3 game a day congresses being heavily disrupted by certain players abusing the 30 seconds increment to drag especially long endgames on for an unnaturally extended duration