Magnus Invitational Online Supertournament
-
- Posts: 3418
- Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2012 5:17 am
Re: Magnus Invitational Online Supertournament
Rd 4
Nakamura 1-0 Carlsen and into Armageddon where the clocks appear to have been set up wrong. The game will probably have to be replayed. Magnus in a winning position is very angry. At the moment its 3-2 Carlsen with nobody knowing what's happening.
Firouzja 0.5-0.5 Ding. (Ding 2.5 - Firouzja 1.5)
Update: Looks like Naka was upset because he got a message during the game, he said it wouldn't have changed the result.
Nepo - Caruana and Giri-MVL tomorrow.
Nakamura 1-0 Carlsen and into Armageddon where the clocks appear to have been set up wrong. The game will probably have to be replayed. Magnus in a winning position is very angry. At the moment its 3-2 Carlsen with nobody knowing what's happening.
Firouzja 0.5-0.5 Ding. (Ding 2.5 - Firouzja 1.5)
Update: Looks like Naka was upset because he got a message during the game, he said it wouldn't have changed the result.
Nepo - Caruana and Giri-MVL tomorrow.
-
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Fri May 11, 2018 4:29 pm
Re: Magnus Invitational Online Supertournament
Exciting stuff! Two Scheveningens in a row from Carlsen. Has he ever played the Scheveningen move order before, allowing the Keres Attack? (Even though Nakamura didn't play it.)
Last edited by NigelDonovan on Sun Apr 19, 2020 8:18 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 5249
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 5:56 pm
- Location: Croydon
Re: Magnus Invitational Online Supertournament
From the official Press Release:Chris Rice wrote: ↑Sat Apr 18, 2020 6:26 pmUpdate: Looks like Naka was upset because he got a message during the game, he said it wouldn't have changed the result.
"A blitz game followed which Carlsen won despite Nakamura complaining he had been disturbed during play. The American, however, did not launch an appeal.
He tweeted: “Fun match, very unsatisfactory ending with the arbiter writing a message to me in the middle of the game to abort while I am thinking about playing Kf1 or Kh1! Not that it changes the outcome, but still…”"
-
- Posts: 3340
- Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 8:27 pm
Re: Magnus Invitational Online Supertournament
Apparently the clocks were right on the player boards. But we’re incorrect from the view of the wider audience. Presumably the arbiter hadn’t realised that they could be showing different things and assumed that they were playing under incorrectly set clocks.
-
- Posts: 5249
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 5:56 pm
- Location: Croydon
Re: Magnus Invitational Online Supertournament
That of course is very specifically an online issue. In a normal OTB game, an arbiter would immediately go and look at the clock at the board.Richard Bates wrote: ↑Sat Apr 18, 2020 8:50 pmApparently the clocks were right on the player boards. But we’re incorrect from the view of the wider audience. Presumably the arbiter hadn’t realised that they could be showing different things and assumed that they were playing under incorrectly set clocks.
I imagine also that the arbiter sought to time his message for the instant when Carlsen moved, but that Nakamura didn't see it until he was in mid thought a few seconds later.
To me this is very reminiscent of problems which we had during the first few British tournaments played with DGTs in 1994.
-
- Posts: 3340
- Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 8:27 pm
Re: Magnus Invitational Online Supertournament
There was the amusing occasion at the Lloyds bank playoff for PCA intel qualifier when Stewart (i think) set the clocks for an Armageddon game at 5:00 vs 4:00. Hours.David Sedgwick wrote: ↑Sat Apr 18, 2020 9:08 pmThat of course is very specifically an online issue. In a normal OTB game, an arbiter would immediately go and look at the clock at the board.Richard Bates wrote: ↑Sat Apr 18, 2020 8:50 pmApparently the clocks were right on the player boards. But we’re incorrect from the view of the wider audience. Presumably the arbiter hadn’t realised that they could be showing different things and assumed that they were playing under incorrectly set clocks.
I imagine also that the arbiter sought to time his message for the instant when Carlsen moved, but that Nakamura didn't see it until he was in mid thought a few seconds later.
To me this is very reminiscent of problems which we had during the first few British tournaments played with DGTs in 1994.
-
- Posts: 5249
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 5:56 pm
- Location: Croydon
Re: Magnus Invitational Online Supertournament
I had forgotten that episode, but now you have reminded me I have a couple of fairly minor corrections.Richard Bates wrote: ↑Sat Apr 18, 2020 9:18 pmThere was the amusing occasion at the Lloyds bank playoff for PCA intel qualifier when Stewart (i think) set the clocks for an Armageddon game at 5:00 vs 4:00. Hours.
1. It was 6:00 vs 5:00. Early Armageddons were, or should have been, 6 minutes against 5 minutes.
2. It wasn't Stewart. I won't embarrass the offender by naming him.
-
- Posts: 1734
- Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2010 12:15 pm
Re: Magnus Invitational Online Supertournament
Did the extra hour prove beneficial?
-
- Posts: 1861
- Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 11:21 am
Re: Magnus Invitational Online Supertournament
I have been informed that "there was some confusion caused by one of the arbiters' Zoom call crashing. Hikaru was distracted by a message not meant for him".David Sedgwick wrote: ↑Sat Apr 18, 2020 9:08 pmThat of course is very specifically an online issue. In a normal OTB game, an arbiter would immediately go and look at the clock at the board.Richard Bates wrote: ↑Sat Apr 18, 2020 8:50 pmApparently the clocks were right on the player boards. But we’re incorrect from the view of the wider audience. Presumably the arbiter hadn’t realised that they could be showing different things and assumed that they were playing under incorrectly set clocks.
I imagine also that the arbiter sought to time his message for the instant when Carlsen moved, but that Nakamura didn't see it until he was in mid thought a few seconds later.
The tournament website does not list the names of any of the officials.....
-
- Posts: 5249
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 5:56 pm
- Location: Croydon
Re: Magnus Invitational Online Supertournament
The report on Chess24 attributes the problem to a bug which has now been fixed.
https://chess24.com/en/read/news/mci-1- ... s-firouzja
https://chess24.com/en/read/news/mci-1- ... s-firouzja
-
- Posts: 3418
- Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2012 5:17 am
Re: Magnus Invitational Online Supertournament
Day 2
Caruana 2.5 - Nepo 1.5 - Three draws and Caruana won the final game
MVL 3-1 Giri
Caruana 2.5 - Nepo 1.5 - Three draws and Caruana won the final game
MVL 3-1 Giri
-
- Posts: 8475
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 1:28 pm
Re: Magnus Invitational Online Supertournament
Alireza is just something else! He may not yet be better than Carlsen, but he isn't afraid of him.
If you want a picture of the future, imagine a QR code stamped on a human face — forever.
-
- Posts: 3418
- Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2012 5:17 am
Re: Magnus Invitational Online Supertournament
Day 3
Carlsen 2.5 - Firouzja 1.5
Nakamura 2.5 - Giri 1.5
Carlsen 2.5 - Firouzja 1.5
Nakamura 2.5 - Giri 1.5
-
- Posts: 3418
- Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2012 5:17 am
Re: Magnus Invitational Online Supertournament
Day 4 and two Armageddons ending up:
Nepo 3-2 MVL
Caruana 3-2 Ding
Nepo 3-2 MVL
Caruana 3-2 Ding
-
- Posts: 7260
- Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 8:13 am
Re: Magnus Invitational Online Supertournament
Both winners also had to win game 4 to force armageddon.Chris Rice wrote: ↑Tue Apr 21, 2020 8:03 pmDay 4 and two Armageddons ending up:
Nepo 3-2 MVL
Caruana 3-2 Ding