39th Olympiad Khanty-Mansiysk 2010 (the chess)

The very latest International round up of English news.
Alex Holowczak
Posts: 9308
Joined: Sat May 30, 2009 5:18 pm
Location: Oldbury, Worcestershire
Contact:

Re: 39th Olympiad Khanty-Mansiysk 2010 (the chess)

Post by Alex Holowczak » Tue Sep 28, 2010 3:01 pm

Roger de Coverly wrote:Both the Counties Competition and the National Club could potentially have evolved into the 4NCL. There are a number of reasons why this didn't happen, the obsession with complex eligibility frameworks amongst them.
I don't think the Counties could, because the ECF only runs half of it, so it wouldn't really work. The National Club would have been perfect to evolve into the 4NCL though.

Ola Winfridsson
Posts: 324
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 12:26 pm

Re: 39th Olympiad Khanty-Mansiysk 2010 (the chess)

Post by Ola Winfridsson » Tue Sep 28, 2010 3:03 pm

Ian Kingston wrote:
Jon D'Souza-Eva wrote:Please tell me that Ivanchuck's opening isn't theory.
http://ugra-chess.com/liveboard?gameid= ... 011&tmnt=1
White's 4th took them out of the known universe.
It takes away Bb4, which tends to be one of the usual counters to the Fantasy Variation. I'm sure it's perfectly fine.

Roger de Coverly
Posts: 22602
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm

Re: 39th Olympiad Khanty-Mansiysk 2010 (the chess)

Post by Roger de Coverly » Tue Sep 28, 2010 3:13 pm

Alex Holowczak wrote:
I don't think the Counties could, because the ECF only runs half of it, so it wouldn't really work.
The ECF either takes over or abolishes the regional stages or has the unions run them on its behalf. The key step (which would have never happened) would have been to make the eligibility as open as the 4NCL.

It's not really relevant to the Olympiad except to observe that the second place finishes of the 1980s well pre-date the 4NCL.

Ola Winfridsson
Posts: 324
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 12:26 pm

Re: 39th Olympiad Khanty-Mansiysk 2010 (the chess)

Post by Ola Winfridsson » Tue Sep 28, 2010 3:21 pm

As regards England's defeat today, I don't think there's ever a reason to expect easy wins against former Soviet Republics even if you outrate them as a team. We're talking about players with a very thorough "chess schooling".

User avatar
Carl Hibbard
Posts: 6134
Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 8:05 pm
Location: Evesham

Re: 39th Olympiad Khanty-Mansiysk 2010 (the chess)

Post by Carl Hibbard » Tue Sep 28, 2010 4:33 pm

The Ivanchuck game is slightly "different" today!!
Cheers
Carl Hibbard

Roger de Coverly
Posts: 22602
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm

Re: 39th Olympiad Khanty-Mansiysk 2010 (the chess)

Post by Roger de Coverly » Tue Sep 28, 2010 4:38 pm

Carl Hibbard wrote:The Ivanchuck game is slightly "different" today!!
I enjoyed his beginner's development of the QR. First he played a4 and then followed it up a few moves later with Ra3.

John Moore
Posts: 2361
Joined: Wed May 14, 2008 6:33 pm

Re: 39th Olympiad Khanty-Mansiysk 2010 (the chess)

Post by John Moore » Tue Sep 28, 2010 4:52 pm

So England-Germany tomorrow on table 15. Germany, of course, are nowhere near as strong as they might be, so let's be hopeful.

Notice also on table 13 (2 up from England) is Ireland- Colombia. Note for Mr Kelly's benefit, Colombia have a GM on board 1 who has played all of the games so far.

I can't resist mentioning that Australia are playing the Czech Republic on table 12 and Iran are on table 9 playing Cuba.

John Moore
Posts: 2361
Joined: Wed May 14, 2008 6:33 pm

Re: 39th Olympiad Khanty-Mansiysk 2010 (the chess)

Post by John Moore » Tue Sep 28, 2010 5:49 pm

Perhaps Mark H might, for once, resist telling Loz who to play.

Mick Norris
Posts: 11366
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 10:12 am
Location: Bolton, Greater Manchester

Re: 39th Olympiad Khanty-Mansiysk 2010 (the chess)

Post by Mick Norris » Tue Sep 28, 2010 6:04 pm

I wonder if either of our top 2 would like a day off? I'm sure Loz isn't bothered about advice posted here!

The Women's team are playing Brazil, so it seems more like football than chess tomorrow
Any postings on here represent my personal views

John Moore
Posts: 2361
Joined: Wed May 14, 2008 6:33 pm

Re: 39th Olympiad Khanty-Mansiysk 2010 (the chess)

Post by John Moore » Tue Sep 28, 2010 6:13 pm

Mick Norris wrote:I wonder if either of our top 2 would like a day off? I'm sure Loz isn't bothered about advice posted here!

The Women's team are playing Brazil, so it seems more like football than chess tomorrow
I am also sure that Loz isn't bothered. But I just get bored with the general - oh we outgrade them by 50 points a board so we should win rubbish

Mark Howitt
Posts: 829
Joined: Sat Nov 22, 2008 8:20 pm
Contact:

Re: 39th Olympiad Khanty-Mansiysk 2010 (the chess)

Post by Mark Howitt » Tue Sep 28, 2010 6:17 pm

Sorry 'Mark H' will still have his opinion.

I don't think there's any reason why we can't play our top four for the remaining games at all. The selection experiment failed today. Blunt but true.

Obviously the selector makes his decisions- it's only after the games are played and the results come in that we can evaluate the impact of them.

If people got tired after working for four days at once then the economy would be in an even worse state than it is now! Nothing would be achieved by anybody in any field if they limited themselves to this. And chess players would be able to play in hardly any tournaments- because there aren't many/any which have five games in five days, rest day, five games in five days, rest day, one game.

John Moore
Posts: 2361
Joined: Wed May 14, 2008 6:33 pm

Re: 39th Olympiad Khanty-Mansiysk 2010 (the chess)

Post by John Moore » Tue Sep 28, 2010 6:20 pm

Hi Mark I called you Mark H to identify you - no other reason

Mark Howitt
Posts: 829
Joined: Sat Nov 22, 2008 8:20 pm
Contact:

Re: 39th Olympiad Khanty-Mansiysk 2010 (the chess)

Post by Mark Howitt » Tue Sep 28, 2010 6:23 pm

I'm not offended by that, or the fact that you may disagree with my opinion. Everyone should say what they feel- and I'm quite a provocative writer anyway, on purpose!

Matthew Peat
Posts: 82
Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2008 11:25 am

Re: 39th Olympiad Khanty-Mansiysk 2010 (the chess)

Post by Matthew Peat » Tue Sep 28, 2010 7:09 pm

What I find curious about the English team is their inconsistency not only as a team but as players.

Short's form has for some years now been unpredictable but both McShane, Howell and Adams came into this event on the back of excellent summers with McShane in particular looking destined to make the move towards 2700. However all three have played well below themselves (maybe a bit harsh on Adams even ignoring the Carlsen game).

Its all a bit reminiscent of a recent football tournament.....

Nick Thomas
Posts: 456
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2008 9:56 pm

Re: 39th Olympiad Khanty-Mansiysk 2010 (the chess)

Post by Nick Thomas » Tue Sep 28, 2010 7:40 pm

John Moore wrote:
Mick Norris wrote:I wonder if either of our top 2 would like a day off? I'm sure Loz isn't bothered about advice posted here!

The Women's team are playing Brazil, so it seems more like football than chess tomorrow
I am also sure that Loz isn't bothered. But I just get bored with the general - oh we outgrade them by 50 points a board so we should win rubbish
I quite agree with this!
Matthew Peat wrote:What I find curious about the English team is their inconsistency not only as a team but as players.

Short's form has for some years now been unpredictable but both McShane, Howell and Adams came into this event on the back of excellent summers with McShane in particular looking destined to make the move towards 2700. However all three have played well below themselves (maybe a bit harsh on Adams even ignoring the Carlsen game).

Its all a bit reminiscent of a recent football tournament.....
I don't find this curious at all. In my opinion it's perfectly normal.

Post Reply