If true, that's very possibly why he decided to play!JustinHorton wrote:He was saying in New In Chess or somewhere that he was thinking about not playing. Who would have been first reserve, Kramnik?
2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
- Matt Mackenzie
- Posts: 6324
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:51 pm
- Location: Millom, Cumbria
Re: 2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
"Set up your attacks so that when the fire is out, it isn't out!" (H N Pillsbury)
-
Mick Norris
- Posts: 11369
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 10:12 am
- Location: Bolton, Greater Manchester
Re: 2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
JakovenkoJustinHorton wrote:He was saying in New In Chess or somewhere that he was thinking about not playing. Who would have been first reserve, Kramnik?
3rd in the Grand Prix is first reserve, no matter what qualifying route gave us the Candidate choosing to withdraw
Vlad was second reserve
Any postings on here represent my personal views
-
Mick Norris
- Posts: 11369
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 10:12 am
- Location: Bolton, Greater Manchester
Re: 2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
Last edited by Mick Norris on Mon Mar 14, 2016 9:08 am, edited 2 times in total.
Any postings on here represent my personal views
-
Jonathan Bryant
- Posts: 3452
- Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 3:54 pm
Re: 2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
Paolo Casaschi wrote: In the first round Anand with white allowed the Berlin but avoided the wall ...
d3 non-Berlin’s are thin gruel compared to the real thing but there was a curious move order wrinkle in Anand’s game with Caruana today.
In round 1 against Topalov, Vishy played 4 d3 Bc5, 5 0-0 which allows 5 ... Nd4 although Toppy chose not to play it.
Today against Caruana Vishy went 5 c3*, which later transposed back into his earlier game. Avoding prep, presumably, but since he obviously had something lined up for 5 ... Nd4 why not play it against Caruana?
* assuming the chess24 moves are correct.
The Abysmal Depths of Chess: https://theabysmaldepthsofchess.blogspot.com
-
Mick Norris
- Posts: 11369
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 10:12 am
- Location: Bolton, Greater Manchester
Re: 2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
Interesting, maybe the kind of game he wanted against Topalov was different to the kind of game he wanted against Caruana? Of course, he might have forgotten his prep, but that's unlikely at move 5Jonathan Bryant wrote:In round 1 against Topalov, Vishy played 4 d3 Bc5, 5 0-0 which allows 5 ... Nd4 although Toppy chose not to play it.
Today against Caruana Vishy went 5 c3*, which later transposed back into his earlier game. Avoiding prep, presumably, but since he obviously had something lined up for 5 ... Nd4 why not play it against Caruana?
* assuming the chess24 moves are correct.
Any postings on here represent my personal views
-
Roger de Coverly
- Posts: 22607
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm
Re: 2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
All of them have recent experience of both allowing and preventing .. Nd4. Anand was prepared to allow Kramnik to play .. Nd4 last month at Zurich.Mick Norris wrote:
Interesting, maybe the kind of game he wanted against Topalov was different to the kind of game he wanted against Caruana?
-
Jonathan Bryant
- Posts: 3452
- Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 3:54 pm
Re: 2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
Roger de Coverly wrote:All of them have recent experience of both allowing and preventing .. Nd4.Mick Norris wrote:
Interesting, maybe the kind of game he wanted against Topalov was different to the kind of game he wanted against Caruana?
Oh sure. And years-old experience too. I just stumbled across a game from 2006 when Anand had the chance to play ... Nd4 as Black against Polar but didn’t bother.
5 0-0 Nd4 is interesting in that it’s often touted as an efficient equaliser for Black but our betters often allow it as White and don’t play when given the option as Black.
All of which makes it even more curious. Why choose one move order against one opponent and the other against another. Or is it all just random and 'no reason' is a deliberate strategy to avoid being a sitting duck for prep?
The Abysmal Depths of Chess: https://theabysmaldepthsofchess.blogspot.com
- JustinHorton
- Posts: 10476
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:06 am
- Location: Somewhere you're not
Re: 2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
Reminiscent of this line: the top players seem to know (or suspect) something, even if the rest of us don't know what it is yet!Jonathan Bryant wrote:5 0-0 Nd4 is interesting in that it’s often touted as an efficient equaliser for Black but our betters often allow it as White and don’t play when given the option as Black.
"Do you play chess?"
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
-
Mick Norris
- Posts: 11369
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 10:12 am
- Location: Bolton, Greater Manchester
Re: 2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
I know it sounds strange after lots of discussions about law suits and (lack of) quality of coverage, but there is actually some chess being played today starting from noon
Karjakin (2) - Anand (2)
Svidler (1.5) - Aronian (2)
Nakamura (1) - Giri (1.5)
Caruana (1.5) - Topalov (0.5)
Karjakin (2) - Anand (2)
Svidler (1.5) - Aronian (2)
Nakamura (1) - Giri (1.5)
Caruana (1.5) - Topalov (0.5)
Any postings on here represent my personal views
- MJMcCready
- Posts: 4394
- Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2013 2:30 pm
Re: 2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
Indeed there is. Nakamura will have to do something with white soon or risk being left behind. But seeing as Giri probably has a better chance than anyone of giving Carlsen a real match, let's hope Naka self-destructs today.
-
MartinCarpenter
- Posts: 3180
- Joined: Tue May 24, 2011 10:58 am
Re: 2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
Something of a pleasing madhouse in the openings 
- MJMcCready
- Posts: 4394
- Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2013 2:30 pm
Re: 2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
Svidler with triple isolated pawns only 13 moves in.
- JustinHorton
- Posts: 10476
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:06 am
- Location: Somewhere you're not
Re: 2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
Karjakin-Anand took my eye, anywayMartinCarpenter wrote:Something of a pleasing madhouse in the openings
"Do you play chess?"
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
-
NickFaulks
- Posts: 9255
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 1:28 pm
Re: 2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
Looks like absurdly deep prep in Naka - Giri, so bound to be a draw.
If you want a picture of the future, imagine a QR code stamped on a human face — forever.
-
MartinCarpenter
- Posts: 3180
- Joined: Tue May 24, 2011 10:58 am
Re: 2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
Quite prescient
Nice drawing finish at least.
It looks like an incredibly scary game but if you've got the sort of memory these people clearly have and have put the work in beforehand then I guess it feels fairly safe somehow?!
It looks like an incredibly scary game but if you've got the sort of memory these people clearly have and have put the work in beforehand then I guess it feels fairly safe somehow?!