True but slightly misleading, as Kasparov went wrong near the end of Game 1, and Nigel could have adjourned with a significant advantage but unfortunately failed to make move 40 in time.Nick Ivell wrote: ↑Sun Nov 28, 2021 6:02 pmNigel was completely outclassed in those anti-Marshalls. Kasparov simply understood those positions better.
Carlsen v Nepomniatchi 2021 World Championship
-
- Posts: 2323
- Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 8:46 pm
- Location: Dublin, Ireland
Re: Carlsen v Nepomniatchi 2021 World Championship
Tim Harding
Historian and FIDE Arbiter
Author of 'Steinitz in London,' British Chess Literature to 1914', 'Joseph Henry Blackburne: A Chess Biography', and 'Eminent Victorian Chess Players'
http://www.chessmail.com
Historian and FIDE Arbiter
Author of 'Steinitz in London,' British Chess Literature to 1914', 'Joseph Henry Blackburne: A Chess Biography', and 'Eminent Victorian Chess Players'
http://www.chessmail.com
-
- Posts: 21320
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm
Re: Carlsen v Nepomniatchi 2021 World Championship
It's still perhaps a matter of style as to whether to provoke an anti-Marshall by playing .. 0-0 before .. d6 even if there's no intention of playing it. These days though, such is the popularity of lines with an early d3 that an a4 anti-Marshall or something very similar is always on the cards. Having lost a game yesterday in an anti-Marshall to the Nb1-d2-f1-g3-f5 plan, i was pleased to see a demonstration by Carlsen on how to rid yourself of the f5 Knight. Namely instead of wandering off to the Queen side with the normal .. Na5, you make space on e7 by playing .. Re8 and .. Bf8 so as to have .. Ne7 challenging a Knight on f5 or d5. Also you play .. h6. So did Short when Kasparov produced that memorable plan of Nf3-h4-g6xf8
-
- Posts: 90
- Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2020 2:26 am
Re: Carlsen v Nepomniatchi 2021 World Championship
Adjournments were at move 60 in that match. With the result there were none at all.Tim Harding wrote: ↑Sun Nov 28, 2021 11:21 pmTrue but slightly misleading, as Kasparov went wrong near the end of Game 1, and Nigel could have adjourned with a significant advantage but unfortunately failed to make move 40 in time.Nick Ivell wrote: ↑Sun Nov 28, 2021 6:02 pmNigel was completely outclassed in those anti-Marshalls. Kasparov simply understood those positions better.
-
- Posts: 369
- Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2009 9:58 am
- Location: Kingston-upon-Thames
Re: Carlsen v Nepomniatchi 2021 World Championship
Chess is about the pursuit of perfection. It's not a circus. Latest Kingston blog.
https://kingstonchess.com/2021/11/29/th ... mpionship/
https://kingstonchess.com/2021/11/29/th ... mpionship/
-
- Posts: 3338
- Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 8:27 pm
Re: Carlsen v Nepomniatchi 2021 World Championship
Although I think your blog is about a bit more than that, competitive (human) chess ceased to become about the pursuit of perfection a long time ago. There are good arguments against speeding up world championship matches in search of decisive results and “excitement” but the search for perfection is not one of them, in my opinion.
In fact at the highest level chess is often explicitly not about seeking out the best moves (at least in the early stages). It is far more about psychology, seeking out positions where one player is comfortable and the other isn’t, and preparation often involves seeking out notionally “inferior” opening lines which are less likely to have been analysed by the opponent in detail.
But speeding up time controls too much focuses on certain aspects of chess to the exclusion of others. Of course there’s a place for all of them in the right circumstances.
In fact at the highest level chess is often explicitly not about seeking out the best moves (at least in the early stages). It is far more about psychology, seeking out positions where one player is comfortable and the other isn’t, and preparation often involves seeking out notionally “inferior” opening lines which are less likely to have been analysed by the opponent in detail.
But speeding up time controls too much focuses on certain aspects of chess to the exclusion of others. Of course there’s a place for all of them in the right circumstances.
-
- Posts: 3199
- Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2013 2:30 pm
Re: Carlsen v Nepomniatchi 2021 World Championship
I didn't think they were under attack. I thought the consensus was that they went out of book early on each game and it was game on. The result of the second game in particular wasn't clear for most of the game. I heard a few questions in the post-match interviews about the results but not enough to say they were under attack -well that's what it sounded like to me anyway.
-
- Posts: 1057
- Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 6:40 pm
Re: Carlsen v Nepomniatchi 2021 World Championship
Y u avoid the Marshall? It loses a pawn
Donate to Sabrina's fundraiser at https://gofund.me/aeae42c7 to support victims of sexual abuse in the chess world.
Northumberland webmaster, Jesmond CC something-or-other. Views mine. Definitely below the Goodall Line.
Northumberland webmaster, Jesmond CC something-or-other. Views mine. Definitely below the Goodall Line.
-
- Posts: 21320
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm
Re: Carlsen v Nepomniatchi 2021 World Championship
At that level, they write their own books. In game 1, what looks like a beginner's pawn blunder by leaving the e pawn undefended was seemingly known by both players as well as others in the elite. Has it ever been published?MJMcCready wrote: ↑Mon Nov 29, 2021 7:02 pmI thought the consensus was that they went out of book early on each game and it was game on.
-
- Posts: 3199
- Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2013 2:30 pm
Re: Carlsen v Nepomniatchi 2021 World Championship
No I doubt it and therein lies a problem of the modern game, determining when they are and aren't in book when a spectator -very difficult to now these days.
-
- Posts: 4828
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 1:13 am
- Location: Bideford
Re: Carlsen v Nepomniatchi 2021 World Championship
No, I'd say the opposite - it's becoming less of a problem with the modern game, because of the ubiquity of chess databases.
-
- Posts: 3496
- Joined: Mon Jul 06, 2009 1:36 pm
- Location: Under Cover
Re: Carlsen v Nepomniatchi 2021 World Championship
Hi Roger,Roger de Coverly wrote: ↑Mon Nov 29, 2021 7:50 pmAt that level, they write their own books. In game 1, what looks like a beginner's pawn blunder by leaving
the e-pawn undefended was seemingly known by both players as well as others in the elite. Has it ever been published?
The first time 8.h3 Na5 was played, that I know of, was in Kalod- Bezgodov, Pardubice 1996.
White actually fell into a pitfall that was similar to one that appeared in Game one.
Nepomniachtchi - Carlsen Game one.
If 14 Nc3 then 14...Qxe5. White played 14.Kf1 which holds the Rook.
Can you imagine the outcry if Nepomniachtchi had played 14.Nc3 in game one of a world title match.
Some people still go on about Fischer's game one 29...Bxh2 and that was 49 years ago!
Kalod- Bezgodov, Pardubice1996.
White played 15.Qf3. Black replied 15...Qxe5.
Kalod- Bezgodov, Pardubice1996.
And speaking of Fischer, there is a 2018 Red Hot pawn game where they followed game one for 12 moves.
The player of the black pieces had chosen for their nickname. 'Robert Fischer.'
-
- Posts: 21320
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm
Re: Carlsen v Nepomniatchi 2021 World Championship
One of the ways of learning an unfamiliar opening is to check out the traps and cheapos. I did wonder why Kf1 was played. It looked a bit early to be centralising the king for the ending. Defusing a trick is an obvious justification.Geoff Chandler wrote: ↑Mon Nov 29, 2021 10:18 pmWhite actually fell into a pitfall that was similar to one that appeared in Game one.
-
- Posts: 3199
- Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2013 2:30 pm
Re: Carlsen v Nepomniatchi 2021 World Championship
Yes that's true but then how many of those viewing have access to databases? If you don't have access to one, I still maintain it's much tougher these days to know when a player is in preparation and when they are not. I just assume that as soon as they start consuming more time, or a lot more time, they are out of home prep. That aside it's very difficult to be sure mainly because they play a lot more stuff these days and are a lot more versatile than, say, 30 years ago.IM Jack Rudd wrote: ↑Mon Nov 29, 2021 8:54 pmNo, I'd say the opposite - it's becoming less of a problem with the modern game, because of the ubiquity of chess databases.
-
- Posts: 3199
- Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2013 2:30 pm
Re: Carlsen v Nepomniatchi 2021 World Championship
As soon as it was played David Howell said it was a computer move. Instant reaction there.Roger de Coverly wrote: ↑Mon Nov 29, 2021 11:45 pmOne of the ways of learning an unfamiliar opening is to check out the traps and cheapos. I did wonder why Kf1 was played. It looked a bit early to be centralising the king for the ending. Defusing a trick is an obvious justification.Geoff Chandler wrote: ↑Mon Nov 29, 2021 10:18 pmWhite actually fell into a pitfall that was similar to one that appeared in Game one.
-
- Posts: 3496
- Joined: Mon Jul 06, 2009 1:36 pm
- Location: Under Cover
Re: Carlsen v Nepomniatchi 2021 World Championship
Today is Carlsen's birthday. He did not play a world title game on his birthday v Caruana or Anand
but he did win a rapid game v Karjakin on November 30th 2016. That was the game that ended with 50 Qh6+!!
Surfed about for more on chess and birthday, found this, a good read.
http://streathambrixtonchess.blogspot.c ... thday.html
(though a comment added 8 years after the original piece states that Steinitz did not play a world title game on his birthday. Still a good read.)
but he did win a rapid game v Karjakin on November 30th 2016. That was the game that ended with 50 Qh6+!!
Surfed about for more on chess and birthday, found this, a good read.
http://streathambrixtonchess.blogspot.c ... thday.html
(though a comment added 8 years after the original piece states that Steinitz did not play a world title game on his birthday. Still a good read.)