Piece values
-
- Posts: 3148
- Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2013 5:24 pm
Piece values
Hi.
What's the basis for assigning numerical values 1-3-5-9 to pieces?
What's the basis for assigning numerical values 1-3-5-9 to pieces?
-
- Posts: 21317
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm
Re: Piece values
Lost in the mists of time I should imagine.soheil_hooshdaran wrote: ↑Wed Apr 18, 2018 12:08 pmWhat's the basis for assigning numerical values 1-3-5-9 to pieces?
It seems to work as a broad rule of thumb for a basic evaluation. The earliest writings on chess theory were by Philidor and then later by Staunton. Did these authors propose theories of piece value?
-
- Posts: 1724
- Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2010 12:15 pm
-
- Posts: 2069
- Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2014 1:28 pm
- Location: Morecambe, Europe
Re: Piece values
Staunton: The Chess Players Handbook Chapter 4Roger de Coverly wrote: ↑Wed Apr 18, 2018 1:07 pmLost in the mists of time I should imagine.soheil_hooshdaran wrote: ↑Wed Apr 18, 2018 12:08 pmWhat's the basis for assigning numerical values 1-3-5-9 to pieces?
It seems to work as a broad rule of thumb for a basic evaluation. The earliest writings on chess theory were by Philidor and then later by Staunton. Did these authors propose theories of piece value?
Code: Select all
Pawn 1.00
Knight 3.05
Bishop 3.50
Rook 5.48
Queen 9.94
-
- Posts: 3148
- Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2013 5:24 pm
Re: Piece values
"Chess:from beginner to GM" gives it the following way:
1-3-4-8
1-3-4-8
-
- Posts: 141
- Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2014 9:50 am
- Location: London
Re: Piece values
There use to be a chess website out there that I can no longer find. Someone had analysed games with material imbalances and calculated the following:
pawn 1.00, knight 3.25, bishop 3.5, rook 5.0, queen 9.75.
I have seen an old chess book that says bishop plus one and a half pawns equals a rook. There is another chess book that says queen is worth 9 or 10 points.
pawn 1.00, knight 3.25, bishop 3.5, rook 5.0, queen 9.75.
I have seen an old chess book that says bishop plus one and a half pawns equals a rook. There is another chess book that says queen is worth 9 or 10 points.
-
- Posts: 71
- Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2014 5:56 pm
Re: Piece values
I was listening to the perpetual podcast with Matthew Sadler and Natasha Regan as guests which included a discussion about Alpha Zero. It was interesting to hear that AZ wasnt programmed with a numerical value for the pieces, raising the question as to whether or how that affected the way it played the game.
-
- Posts: 21317
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm
Re: Piece values
It wasn't programmed with any rules at all. What it came up with is entirely self taught. It doesn't evaluate by notional pawn values either, giving assessments as percentage winning chances.Mark Ashley wrote: ↑Fri Mar 22, 2019 8:56 amIt was interesting to hear that AZ wasnt programmed with a numerical value for the pieces, raising the question as to whether or how that affected the way it played the game.
Actually a human could play with no piece values. You observe that at the start of the game, both sides have eight pawns, one queen, two rooks, two knights, a light squared bishop and a dark squared bishop. Whether or not notional values are assigned, the material is equal until you get unbalanced exchanges, even a bishop for a knight. Material values are just a first approximation to evaluating the relative worth of such exchanges.
-
- Posts: 141
- Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2014 9:50 am
- Location: London
Re: Piece values
A bishop is worth more than a knight in most positions and used to be called the minor exchange.
-
- Posts: 1865
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 2:35 pm
- Location: All Of Them
Re: Piece values
If only it could actually give back some of its newfound learnings about how the game should be played then it might be worth something more than just another case of "oh look how much better computers are than humans.... at a very specific function... performed on the best hardware money can buy"Mark Ashley wrote: ↑Fri Mar 22, 2019 8:56 amI was listening to the perpetual podcast with Matthew Sadler and Natasha Regan as guests which included a discussion about Alpha Zero. It was interesting to hear that AZ wasnt programmed with a numerical value for the pieces, raising the question as to whether or how that affected the way it played the game.
Lose one queen and it is a disaster, Lose 1000 queens and it is just a statistic.
-
- Posts: 8472
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 1:28 pm
Re: Piece values
Isn't that precisely what the interpretative work of Sadler and Regan is doing?Joey Stewart wrote: ↑Thu Jun 27, 2019 11:10 amIf only it could actually give back some of its newfound learnings about how the game should be played
If you want a picture of the future, imagine a QR code stamped on a human face — forever.
-
- Posts: 3052
- Joined: Tue May 24, 2011 10:58 am
Re: Piece values
They're doing high level interpretations of the results, which are obviously rather useful! All you can do anyway
There's absolutely no way to go back and work what internal representations Alpha Zero has created to use for things like piece values, king safety etc. That's just how neural nets are. A little bit like trying to work out how your own subconcious works.
They are trying to work out ways to produce neural nets you can interrogate but that's a good way off.
There's absolutely no way to go back and work what internal representations Alpha Zero has created to use for things like piece values, king safety etc. That's just how neural nets are. A little bit like trying to work out how your own subconcious works.
They are trying to work out ways to produce neural nets you can interrogate but that's a good way off.
Re: Piece values
We all know that the interrogation will produce the following answer -
8 (pawns) + 6 (2 knights) + 7 (2 bishops) + 10 (2 rooks) + 9 (queen) + 2 (king) = 42!
8 (pawns) + 6 (2 knights) + 7 (2 bishops) + 10 (2 rooks) + 9 (queen) + 2 (king) = 42!
-
- Posts: 5834
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 12:28 pm
Re: Piece values
"42"
And there may sadly be many who do not realise the significance of that...
And there may sadly be many who do not realise the significance of that...
Re: Piece values
Yes indeed, pity those who don't know it's the answer to "life, the universe and everything" (including, of course, why the chess king is to be valued at 2 notional pawns!)
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/yes- ... 51201.html
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/yes- ... 51201.html