Chris Goodall wrote: ↑Fri Sep 17, 2021 2:04 pm
Paul McKeown wrote: ↑Fri Sep 17, 2021 1:34 pm
A typically graceful comment from the fool who claimed that I worked for CSC for 12 years and that that had biased my posting.
For for 5 years,
with for the other 7.
I have had no connection with CSC whatsoever for the past seven years.
For five years and two months I travelled to several (mostly primary) schools a week - up to nine or so a week at the peak - most of them deprived inner city schools. It was tough emotionally at times; some of the kids were in wretched straits. I certainly would never otherwise have came across a ten year old who dropped out as it later transpired that he had attempted to kill himself in school. Nevertheless, despite the emotional challenges, it was also rewarding, as you could see the joy that chess can bring to - in my case many hundreds or perhaps one or two thousands - of children.
In the past seven years, however I have not worked in a single school or in any other capacity paid or unpaid for CSC, not received any income, nor expenses from CSC, nor have I donated to CSC, either, for that matter.
I have not been in receipt of regular communications from CSC, either, until during the pandemic when MP started his online collaboration with chesskids, whose emails I do receive, like a huge number of others. Again, though, I am not part of that scheme, nor do I derive income from that scheme, nor do I give funding to that scheme. I may have advertised it to the RJCC mailing list, not sure. But then I advertise many things to that list, none of which are anything to do with CSC.
I believe that during the past seven years, I may have sent a couple of schools to speak to CSC who wanted a chess club, but couldn't afford to pay for it.
Oh. I suppose I should declare that I regularly purchase equipment from Malcolm's emporium on Baker Street. Like thousands of others, but at a much higher volume than the average.
That is it.
Any further connection ("for", "with" or using any other preposition of your choice) that you state is either your delusion or your intentional defamation.
I corrected your idiotic mistake once - idiotic as it was easy to check. You have now chosen to ignore the correction and continue with the statement that I am beholden to CSC as its servant for the past twelve years. That is no longer a mistake. As you KNOW that it is wrong, and insist on regaling the world with this mistake, it is now a lie.
You're a motivated liar, and shameless about it. Or daft.
You can tell me which it is, if you like. But I'm really not interested, either. Apart from your lies, you hold no interest for me.