Media comments on chess

Discuss anything you like about chess related matters in this forum.
Stewart Reuben
Posts: 4542
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:04 pm
Location: writer

Re: Media comments on chess

Post by Stewart Reuben » Sun Aug 01, 2021 6:22 pm

I just accessed this. The 2.5 hours is devoted to the Hungarian GP. The chess sets are being offered as prizes. 1st prize is worth $25,000. Now, if it were £25,000, I might have been interested,
Some years ago I did try to interest Red Bull in sponsoring chess. They had an amusing chess ad. There was no response - unless that gave them the idea of working with Hikaru Nakamura.

Chris Rice
Posts: 3417
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2012 5:17 am

Re: Media comments on chess

Post by Chris Rice » Tue Aug 03, 2021 12:14 am

Athletics using chess to decide an Olympic title? It would appear that the offer of a draw from Mutaz Essa Barshim (Qatar) to Gianmarco Tamberi (Italy) in the High Jump so that they could share the Olympic title will be one of the sporting highlights of the Tokyo Olympics. However, it did occur to me that if you're thinking of offering a daw in an OTB chess and you suspect that your opponent will react like Tamberi you might think twice about offering it in the first place. Seriously, though that was a really great moment in the Olympics.

Stewart Reuben
Posts: 4542
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:04 pm
Location: writer

Re: Media comments on chess

Post by Stewart Reuben » Tue Aug 03, 2021 1:31 am

I only just spotted this in the 1 August Sunday Times. Page 13 of the News Section.
Chess boffins' bid to balance the board: let black move twice. Written by Tony Allen-Miles
White holds a small advantage by making the first move. Proposed solution:
White starts with one move. Then black has two. Then white has two; then reverting to alternate moves.
Luke McShane was consulted (Why not their chess correspondent David Howell?). He poured scorn on the idea; it would demolish centuries of opening strategy. It would lead to a narrower advantage for white, but at a great cost.
The Fairer Chess study will be presented to a conference on games in Copenhagen on August 17.

My own idea, that white only be allowed to castle on one side of the board, would balance the game. But I never bothered to suggest it as it would never get through FIDE.
Remember what happened to allowing games to be scored 3 for a win, 1 for a draw and 0 for a loss? Just like in the football league.There were a few RR played like that, but the variation ended up in the dustbin of history.

Roger de Coverly
Posts: 21301
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm

Re: Media comments on chess

Post by Roger de Coverly » Tue Aug 03, 2021 8:39 am

Stewart Reuben wrote:
Tue Aug 03, 2021 1:31 am
Chess boffins' bid to balance the board: let black move twice.
Discussed under the heading "Fairer Chess"
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=11965

User avatar
JustinHorton
Posts: 10364
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:06 am
Location: Somewhere you're not

Re: Media comments on chess

Post by JustinHorton » Tue Aug 03, 2021 9:05 am

Stewart Reuben wrote:
Tue Aug 03, 2021 1:31 am
Written by Tony Allen-Miles
Uh huh
"Do you play chess?"
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."

lostontime.blogspot.com

NickFaulks
Posts: 8453
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 1:28 pm

Re: Media comments on chess

Post by NickFaulks » Tue Aug 03, 2021 9:14 am

Chris Rice wrote:
Tue Aug 03, 2021 12:14 am
Seriously, though that was a really great moment in the Olympics.
I thought it was dreadful, particularly if, as is likely, it was a harbinger of things to come. A gold medal means that you were better than all the others.

I might not have minded so much if the IOC had minted special combo gold / silver medals, but both athletes got normal gold medals.
If you want a picture of the future, imagine a QR code stamped on a human face — forever.

Kevin Thurlow
Posts: 5821
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 12:28 pm

Re: Media comments on chess

Post by Kevin Thurlow » Tue Aug 03, 2021 10:22 am

"A gold medal means that you were better than all the others."

Citius, altius, fortius, especially altius. In some ways the agreed draw (or draw by repetition of not doing 2.39 m three times) seemed a fair result, and the athletes were clearly happy, but it's not quite the same as a dead heat. The rules do allow what they did (at present) and Buchholz would not have worked. A quick search says the tie-break procedure is to reduce the height of the bar and then if one succeeds and the other fails, they stop, which is a bit odd as we already know the guy who lost can jump higher a few minutes ago.
Sharing the gold looks preferable to an armageddon jump off, where one jumper gets 5 attempts and the other gets 4...

NickFaulks
Posts: 8453
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 1:28 pm

Re: Media comments on chess

Post by NickFaulks » Tue Aug 03, 2021 10:59 am

Kevin Thurlow wrote:
Tue Aug 03, 2021 10:22 am
Sharing the gold looks preferable
But they didn't share the gold medal, did they? They got one each.
If you want a picture of the future, imagine a QR code stamped on a human face — forever.

Kevin Thurlow
Posts: 5821
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 12:28 pm

Re: Media comments on chess

Post by Kevin Thurlow » Tue Aug 03, 2021 12:06 pm

Clumsy wording by me, I meant shared first place, which is not the same thing of course.

NickFaulks
Posts: 8453
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 1:28 pm

Re: Media comments on chess

Post by NickFaulks » Tue Aug 03, 2021 12:16 pm

Kevin Thurlow wrote:
Tue Aug 03, 2021 12:06 pm
Clumsy wording by me, I meant shared first place, which is not the same thing of course.
That's my point. If they shared first place, then they should have shared the gold medal ( and the silver medal too ).
If you want a picture of the future, imagine a QR code stamped on a human face — forever.

Stewart Reuben
Posts: 4542
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:04 pm
Location: writer

Re: Media comments on chess

Post by Stewart Reuben » Tue Aug 03, 2021 12:34 pm

All tie break systems are flawed, but some are more flawed than others.

It is different for a spectator sport, where a climax is usually desirable. Most chess events don't have that advantage, so sharing first prize is OK. In chess, both Bucholz and Sonneborn-Berger are nonsense, but widely accepted. FIDE don't seem to care about games won by forfeit. Ra seems to me most logical.
A play-off is fine - except if it is again tied. Armageddon is not chess, it is a variant, just as penalty shot outs is not football.

User avatar
Matt Mackenzie
Posts: 5205
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:51 pm
Location: Millom, Cumbria

Re: Media comments on chess

Post by Matt Mackenzie » Tue Aug 03, 2021 1:38 pm

JustinHorton wrote:
Tue Aug 03, 2021 9:05 am
Stewart Reuben wrote:
Tue Aug 03, 2021 1:31 am
Written by Tony Allen-Miles
Uh huh
What should we know about said person?
"Set up your attacks so that when the fire is out, it isn't out!" (H N Pillsbury)

Geoff Chandler
Posts: 3486
Joined: Mon Jul 06, 2009 1:36 pm
Location: Under Cover
Contact:

Re: Media comments on chess

Post by Geoff Chandler » Tue Aug 03, 2021 1:56 pm

Apparently the first time a gold was shared was in 1912.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1912_Summer_Olympics

It was in 'Art Competitions.' a couple of architects shared the gold medal. (I'm not making this up.)

Ian Thompson
Posts: 3551
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2008 4:31 pm
Location: Awbridge, Hampshire

Re: Media comments on chess

Post by Ian Thompson » Tue Aug 03, 2021 1:58 pm

Matt Mackenzie wrote:
Tue Aug 03, 2021 1:38 pm
JustinHorton wrote:
Tue Aug 03, 2021 9:05 am
Stewart Reuben wrote:
Tue Aug 03, 2021 1:31 am
Written by Tony Allen-Miles
Uh huh
What should we know about said person?
That he didn't write the article in question and probably doesn't exist. The author of the article was Tony Allen-Mills.

David Sedgwick
Posts: 5249
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 5:56 pm
Location: Croydon
Contact:

Re: Media comments on chess

Post by David Sedgwick » Wed Aug 04, 2021 6:48 pm

Ian Thompson wrote:
Tue Aug 03, 2021 1:58 pm
The author of the article was Tony Allen-Mills.
... whom I knew quite well at one time. Michael Farthing may also remember him.

"TAM" (or more formally "ABAM") was President of the Cambridge Students Union in 1974 - 1975.

Post Reply