Page 1 of 36
Chess Masters: the Endgame
Posted: Tue Mar 04, 2025 6:39 pm
by Roland Kensdale
Long article including profiles of all the players.
Think this programme probably deserves it's own thread, many comments may be lost under 'media comments on chess', another thread dedicated to a poll. If this thread not required, please use that.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/mediacentre/media ... ss-masters
Chess Masters Series On BBC
Posted: Tue Mar 04, 2025 7:42 pm
by Steve Emmerton
The new Chess Masters series starts on BBC2 and BBC iPlayer on Monday 10th March. Click here for further details - https://www.bbc.co.uk/mediacentre/media ... ss-masters
Re: Chess Masters: the Endgame
Posted: Tue Mar 04, 2025 7:52 pm
by Nick Burrows
Re: Chess Masters Series On BBC
Posted: Tue Mar 04, 2025 10:21 pm
by Matt Mackenzie
Already a thread on this in the General Chat section, puzzled about its relevance to "ECF Matters" tbh.
Re: Chess Masters Series On BBC
Posted: Wed Mar 05, 2025 10:38 am
by Steve Emmerton
You're right !! I put it in the wrong place. Didn't realise there was already a thread going.
Re: Chess Masters: the Endgame
Posted: Wed Mar 05, 2025 4:28 pm
by Geoff Chandler
The players have been given nicknames; 'The Smiling Assassin’ is Caitlin Reid from Scotland, Tallulah (Lula) is 'The Chess Princess.' Nick Templar ‘The Swashbuckler’
Re: Chess Masters: the Endgame
Posted: Wed Mar 05, 2025 5:03 pm
by jholyhead
Thalia was a strong Division 1 player in the Shropshire League until she moved to Chester, so the Welsh Marches have our champion.
Re: Chess Masters: the Endgame
Posted: Wed Mar 05, 2025 7:43 pm
by Nick Ivell
I welcome the return of chess to TV. I seem to recall Karpov from the Master Game; these players seem somewhat less distinguished.
Re: Chess Masters: the Endgame
Posted: Wed Mar 05, 2025 7:58 pm
by NickFaulks
Online bullet has given you the opportunity to watch top players playing poor chess. Now you can watch mediocre players playing poor chess. You can't stand in the way of progress.
Re: Chess Masters: the Endgame
Posted: Wed Mar 05, 2025 8:33 pm
by Geoff Chandler
Hi Nick,
We have to give a good chance. If they were GM's most of the moves will go over the heads of 90% of the viewers. I have no problem seeing some plausible blunders being made, and I expect some, especially at rapid. David seems to comment for the weakest viewers (which is how it should be) so explaining them is covered.
If it takes off there will be more. And I really do expect we will see some good games. The are some reasonable players in that line up. Looking forward to it.
Re: Chess Masters: the Endgame
Posted: Wed Mar 05, 2025 9:30 pm
by AustinElliott
Wondering if contestant 'Kel' could be Kelechukwu Nkwonta, who plays for the Bolton Chess Club 1st and 2nd teams in the local leagues. He's an 1850-1900 rated player with an attacking style.
Re: Chess Masters: the Endgame
Posted: Wed Mar 05, 2025 9:50 pm
by Mick Norris
Yes, see other thread
Re: Chess Masters: the Endgame
Posted: Wed Mar 05, 2025 9:52 pm
by Matt Fletcher
I’m going to give it a look - they all seem to be pretty decent players and very enthusiastic about their chess.
If it takes off I’m also looking forward to fielding the “x on Chess Masters was pretty good - could you beat them?” from friends and colleagues!
Re: Chess Masters: the Endgame
Posted: Wed Mar 05, 2025 10:54 pm
by Roger de Coverly
NickFaulks wrote: ↑Wed Mar 05, 2025 7:58 pm
Now you can watch mediocre players playing poor chess.
There may not be so many actual games. The publicity seemed to imply some problem and puzzle solving was included.
If 1600 is still around the middle of the rating distribution of active amateur players, the players seem to be between average and above average.
Re: Chess Masters: the Endgame
Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2025 9:10 am
by Kevin Thurlow
TV "Game Shows" have different sorts of participants. Mastermind wants people that programme makers think are going to do well at answering tough questions. Generation Game wanted people who would have fun and wouldn't mind looking a bit silly to entertain the viewing millions.
Here it seems they want people who can actually play, but are not superstars. I watched a Chessable course where Magnus Carlsen talked about a move and said it was obviously bad. The eyes of his IM companion widened and he had to ask "why?"! This was a relief to me as I was wondering the same.
Presumably the intention is that more of the audience will understand what's going on watching the selected players than watching Gukesh - Carlsen.
With a bit of luck, people watching will think, "I can beat these people" and they will play more chess. I hope the contestants enjoy the experience. I expect to see one of them next month and I will certainly ask!