Well, nor were quite a few other words that now are?Paul Habershon wrote: ↑Thu Jun 10, 2021 9:50 amIt's such a pity that the p ... y word in the chess problem pawn discussion has become taboo. It wasn't so originally and I find it quite pleasant sounding. It should still be innocently bracketed with bambino, wee bairn etc. which I assume are still ok.
Racist terminology in chess problems
-
- Posts: 5262
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:51 pm
- Location: Millom, Cumbria
Re: Racist terminology in chess problems
"Set up your attacks so that when the fire is out, it isn't out!" (H N Pillsbury)
-
- Posts: 558
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2010 5:51 pm
Re: Racist terminology in chess problems
Agreed. That's why it's such a pity.Matt Mackenzie wrote: ↑Thu Jun 10, 2021 2:20 pmWell, nor were quite a few other words that now are?Paul Habershon wrote: ↑Thu Jun 10, 2021 9:50 amIt's such a pity that the p ... y word in the chess problem pawn discussion has become taboo. It wasn't so originally and I find it quite pleasant sounding. It should still be innocently bracketed with bambino, wee bairn etc. which I assume are still ok.
-
- Posts: 3452
- Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 3:54 pm
Re: Racist terminology in chess problems
Matt Mackenzie wrote: ↑Thu Jun 10, 2021 2:20 pmWell, nor were quite a few other words that now are?Paul Habershon wrote: ↑Thu Jun 10, 2021 9:50 amIt's such a pity that the p ... y word in the chess problem pawn discussion has become taboo. It wasn't so originally and I find it quite pleasant sounding. It should still be innocently bracketed with bambino, wee bairn etc. which I assume are still ok.
It’s also worth asking if there was never any issue with the word or whether when we say “wasn’t so originally” we mean ‘across the board’ or ‘for a certain subset of people’
The Abysmal Depths of Chess: https://theabysmaldepthsofchess.blogspot.com
-
- Posts: 1214
- Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 11:35 am
Re: Racist terminology in chess problems
Even the N word started off as non-derogatory, and has regained that sense more than once, according to Wikipedia:Jonathan Bryant wrote: ↑Thu Jun 10, 2021 6:00 pmMatt Mackenzie wrote: ↑Thu Jun 10, 2021 2:20 pmWell, nor were quite a few other words that now are?Paul Habershon wrote: ↑Thu Jun 10, 2021 9:50 amIt's such a pity that the p ... y word in the chess problem pawn discussion has become taboo. It wasn't so originally and I find it quite pleasant sounding. It should still be innocently bracketed with bambino, wee bairn etc. which I assume are still ok.
It’s also worth asking if there was never any issue with the word or whether when we say “wasn’t so originally” we mean ‘across the board’ or ‘for a certain subset of people’
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nigger
-
- Posts: 7258
- Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2007 10:29 am
- Location: Cove, Hampshire, England.
Re: Racist terminology in chess problems
British Chess News : britishchessnews.com
Twitter: @BritishChess
Facebook: facebook.com/groups/britishchess
Twitter: @BritishChess
Facebook: facebook.com/groups/britishchess
-
- Posts: 5249
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 5:56 pm
- Location: Croydon
Re: Racist terminology in chess problems
I agree with the decision to replace the headstone. The original wording only distracted from the message.John Upham wrote: ↑Fri Jun 11, 2021 9:58 amHas anyone read this?
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-l ... e-53446494
John
-
- Posts: 7258
- Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2007 10:29 am
- Location: Cove, Hampshire, England.
Re: Racist terminology in chess problems
How would you answer the comments of historian James Holland?David Sedgwick wrote: ↑Fri Jun 11, 2021 12:10 pmI agree with the decision to replace the headstone. The original wording only distracted from the message.John Upham wrote: ↑Fri Jun 11, 2021 9:58 amHas anyone read this?
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-l ... e-53446494
John
British Chess News : britishchessnews.com
Twitter: @BritishChess
Facebook: facebook.com/groups/britishchess
Twitter: @BritishChess
Facebook: facebook.com/groups/britishchess
-
- Posts: 1930
- Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2015 2:44 pm
Re: Racist terminology in chess problems
I surely can't be alone in wishing that more time and effort was spent in combatting ultra-right-wing groups with unashamedly racist views and rather less on arguing over a word, admittedly inappropriate in today's climate, written without racist intent in a context where its existence would - but for this thread - have remained largely unnoticed and thus have caused offence to very few, if anyone.
-
- Posts: 10364
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:06 am
- Location: Somewhere you're not
Re: Racist terminology in chess problems
Then wish away, Roger, but here's a question that's been raised and it would be better to address it than not.
"Do you play chess?"
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
lostontime.blogspot.com
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
lostontime.blogspot.com
-
- Posts: 1930
- Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2015 2:44 pm
Re: Racist terminology in chess problems
Some questions don't merit answers.JustinHorton wrote: ↑Fri Jun 11, 2021 1:23 pmThen wish away, Roger, but here's a question that's been raised and it would be better to address it than not.
-
- Posts: 49
- Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2018 2:38 pm
- Location: The Netherlands
Re: Racist terminology in chess problems
I think it's wrong to suggest that the word, if encountered by a modern-day reader (or a reader in 1976 for that matter) for whom the connotations have personal relevance, would have remained largely unnoticed and caused little offence. The difference nowadays is that people feel more empowered to speak up and challenge the discrimination than they did 45 years ago.
Feeling empowered to speak up is an important issue. Not being shouted down by almost everyone when you do so is a key factor. I remember an incident in the early 1980s along similar lines. I can't link to any source, but from memory it was written by the editor of a major British chess magazine. The approximate details are as follows. An author had produced a children's chess book which used language clearly designed to make the game seem exciting to young people. It pitted the White and Black pieces as opposing armies and, unfortunately, used language along the lines of a race war, almost certainly unintentionally but nonetheless. A teacher who had acquired the book for use in their classroom called the author out publicly on their use of "racist" language in the book. The editor of the chess magazine reported on this and basically ridiculed the whistle-blower in no uncertain terms, calling the original book an "innocent frolic" and making the juvenile observation that the main teaching union's name was often abbreviated to NUT.
That incident occurred just a few years later than 1976 when the problem book referred to by Justin Horton was published. The era was dogged by a culture in which you could not call such (potential) racism out without suffering a major backlash. We need to make sure that we have moved on from that shutting-down culture of not allowing racism to be exposed for what it is, whether the racism is intentional or not.
Feeling empowered to speak up is an important issue. Not being shouted down by almost everyone when you do so is a key factor. I remember an incident in the early 1980s along similar lines. I can't link to any source, but from memory it was written by the editor of a major British chess magazine. The approximate details are as follows. An author had produced a children's chess book which used language clearly designed to make the game seem exciting to young people. It pitted the White and Black pieces as opposing armies and, unfortunately, used language along the lines of a race war, almost certainly unintentionally but nonetheless. A teacher who had acquired the book for use in their classroom called the author out publicly on their use of "racist" language in the book. The editor of the chess magazine reported on this and basically ridiculed the whistle-blower in no uncertain terms, calling the original book an "innocent frolic" and making the juvenile observation that the main teaching union's name was often abbreviated to NUT.
That incident occurred just a few years later than 1976 when the problem book referred to by Justin Horton was published. The era was dogged by a culture in which you could not call such (potential) racism out without suffering a major backlash. We need to make sure that we have moved on from that shutting-down culture of not allowing racism to be exposed for what it is, whether the racism is intentional or not.
-
- Posts: 10364
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:06 am
- Location: Somewhere you're not
Re: Racist terminology in chess problems
That comment casts more light on this discussion than anything I could ever say.Roger Lancaster wrote: ↑Fri Jun 11, 2021 1:52 pmSome questions don't merit answers.JustinHorton wrote: ↑Fri Jun 11, 2021 1:23 pmThen wish away, Roger, but here's a question that's been raised and it would be better to address it than not.
"Do you play chess?"
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
lostontime.blogspot.com
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
lostontime.blogspot.com
-
- Posts: 1930
- Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2015 2:44 pm
Re: Racist terminology in chess problems
A phrase concerning pots and kettles comes to mind there, Justin.JustinHorton wrote: ↑Fri Jun 11, 2021 2:21 pmThat comment casts more light on this discussion than anything I could ever say.Roger Lancaster wrote: ↑Fri Jun 11, 2021 1:52 pmSome questions don't merit answers.JustinHorton wrote: ↑Fri Jun 11, 2021 1:23 pmThen wish away, Roger, but here's a question that's been raised and it would be better to address it than not.
-
- Posts: 10364
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:06 am
- Location: Somewhere you're not
Re: Racist terminology in chess problems
In all seriousness Roger, thank you very much, you've been most helpful.
"Do you play chess?"
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
lostontime.blogspot.com
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
lostontime.blogspot.com
-
- Posts: 1930
- Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2015 2:44 pm
Re: Racist terminology in chess problems
I'm not disputing that use of the word caused some offence but only to a small number of people and, even to them, not on the same scale as a racially-motivated physical or even verbal attack. In much the same way, I can see that "night watchman" will upset some cricket fans as sexist but I'd prefer those people "more empowered to speak up and challenge the discrimination" to speak up and challenge instead those abusing female cricketers.Brian Egdell wrote: ↑Fri Jun 11, 2021 2:05 pmI think it's wrong to suggest that the word, if encountered by a modern-day reader (or a reader in 1976 for that matter) for whom the connotations have personal relevance, would have remained largely unnoticed and caused little offence. The difference nowadays is that people feel more empowered to speak up and challenge the discrimination than they did 45 years ago.
Feeling empowered to speak up is an important issue. Not being shouted down by almost everyone when you do so is a key factor. I remember an incident in the early 1980s along similar lines. I can't link to any source, but from memory it was written by the editor of a major British chess magazine. The approximate details are as follows. An author had produced a children's chess book which used language clearly designed to make the game seem exciting to young people. It pitted the White and Black pieces as opposing armies and, unfortunately, used language along the lines of a race war, almost certainly unintentionally but nonetheless. A teacher who had acquired the book for use in their classroom called the author out publicly on their use of "racist" language in the book. The editor of the chess magazine reported on this and basically ridiculed the whistle-blower in no uncertain terms, calling the original book an "innocent frolic" and making the juvenile observation that the main teaching union's name was often abbreviated to NUT.
That incident occurred just a few years later than 1976 when the problem book referred to by Justin Horton was published. The era was dogged by a culture in which you could not call such (potential) racism out without suffering a major backlash. We need to make sure that we have moved on from that shutting-down culture of not allowing racism to be exposed for what it is, whether the racism is intentional or not.