Not quite the same thing - undeveloping a knight to the other knight's starting square. This appeared in the December issue of Chess magazine.
Putting pieces back on their starting squares in the opening
-
- Posts: 607
- Joined: Mon May 16, 2011 3:45 pm
-
- Posts: 3452
- Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 3:54 pm
Re: Putting pieces back on their starting squares in the opening
Ivanchuk, as Black once beat Kasparov withKevin O'Rourke wrote: ↑Fri Jan 15, 2021 2:45 pmI seem to have a mental block and a dislike to put a piece back on its starting square after moving it.
I’ve seen it in grandmaster games, things like Bf8 ....
1 e4 e6, 2 d4 d5, 3 Nc3 Bb4, 4 e5 b6, 5 a3 Bf8
Which I imagine amused Gazza not one bit.
The Abysmal Depths of Chess: https://theabysmaldepthsofchess.blogspot.com
-
- Posts: 21318
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm
Re: Putting pieces back on their starting squares in the opening
It's an old Petrosian line, so he should have known it.Jonathan Bryant wrote: ↑Tue Jan 19, 2021 11:40 amIvanchuk, as Black once beat Kasparov with
1 e4 e6, 2 d4 d5, 3 Nc3 Bb4, 4 e5 b6, 5 a3 Bf8
Which I imagine amused Gazza not one bit.
-
- Posts: 10364
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:06 am
- Location: Somewhere you're not
Re: Putting pieces back on their starting squares in the opening
And here we see Kasparov moving a piece back to its original square, against Petrosian. And losing.
"Do you play chess?"
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
lostontime.blogspot.com
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
lostontime.blogspot.com
-
- Posts: 3452
- Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 3:54 pm
Re: Putting pieces back on their starting squares in the opening
Yes and I'm sure he did.Roger de Coverly wrote: ↑Tue Jan 19, 2021 12:03 pm
It's an old Petrosian line, so he should have known it.
Nearly 10 years ago I reached this position as Black against John Hickman at Sunningdale. I remember not fancying ... Bd7 too much (not sure why now) and eventually coming to the idea of ... Bc8. Initially I wasn't even going to look at it properly - as per the OP's original point, it just felt too silly - but eventually I did and couldn't see anything wrong with it. So I played it.
HIARCS seems to think Black's doing well after 10 ... Bc8. Mind you, it doesn't mind ... Bd7 either.
The Abysmal Depths of Chess: https://theabysmaldepthsofchess.blogspot.com