Assigning numerical values to chess pieces.
-
- Posts: 3198
- Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2013 2:30 pm
Assigning numerical values to chess pieces.
Which nutjob thought it was a good idea to attach unchanging numerical values to pieces? Weren't there more preferable alternatives offered. Is the value of the piece denoting its power at the start of the game? I doubt that. Kramnik was harping on about 3xchange sacrifices, pointing out that rooks are only good in the endgame, and in the opening almost useless. What was the procedure in giving a value? A pawn =1???? Not all pawns are the same. The e-pawn is of more value than the e-pawn. Isn't there a more dynamic way of assessing the strength of the pieces, like measuring their capabilities during the game played. I might only have a pawn for a Knight but if it's about to queen, I dont value that pawn as 1.
Doesnt the true value of a piece in play come from the power it is exerting in the game. Cant we just keep it at that? After all we talk about a bad bishop and a good bishop, what is the difference between them numerically?
Chess players love numbers but are they really the answer. A rough guide perhaps but no more.
Doesnt the true value of a piece in play come from the power it is exerting in the game. Cant we just keep it at that? After all we talk about a bad bishop and a good bishop, what is the difference between them numerically?
Chess players love numbers but are they really the answer. A rough guide perhaps but no more.
-
- Posts: 604
- Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2020 8:14 pm
Re: Assigning numerical values to chess pieces.
You are indeed describing what engines and players do: the value of pieces depend on the context of the board.
Otherwise the points are a decent indicator for beginners, all other things equal. You cannot compare the mobility of a pawn versus a queen, unless in very specific contexts.
One Messi is worth quite a bit more than a random division 2 player. But a Messi playing with 10 year olds will not be as valuable playing against Liverpool or City.
The context is indeed important, but there are also intrinsic differences in value.
Otherwise the points are a decent indicator for beginners, all other things equal. You cannot compare the mobility of a pawn versus a queen, unless in very specific contexts.
One Messi is worth quite a bit more than a random division 2 player. But a Messi playing with 10 year olds will not be as valuable playing against Liverpool or City.
The context is indeed important, but there are also intrinsic differences in value.
-
- Posts: 10364
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:06 am
- Location: Somewhere you're not
Re: Assigning numerical values to chess pieces.
What a silly thing to say.
"Do you play chess?"
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
lostontime.blogspot.com
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
lostontime.blogspot.com
-
- Posts: 3604
- Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 11:54 am
Re: Assigning numerical values to chess pieces.
You can see how Alan Turing assigned values, not only to the pieces, but also the function that they are performing here
https://en.chessbase.com/post/reconstru ... er-machine
https://en.chessbase.com/post/reconstru ... er-machine
-
- Posts: 3198
- Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2013 2:30 pm
Re: Assigning numerical values to chess pieces.
But pieces and pawns never can and never could maintain a fixed value. To say a knight is worth 3.XX okay yes perhaps in the generic sense but this valuation is almost worthless in the context of a game as it strength and weakness is in flux. No two pawns are the same, so why does have say a rook is worth 5 pawns? Which pawns and at what stage in the game? The rooks can't even move at the beginning of the game, they are usually the most ineffective pieces on the board before move 25.
-
- Posts: 21318
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm
Re: Assigning numerical values to chess pieces.
If you look at a position and want a very quick evaluation as to which side may be better, counting material is a way to do it.MJMcCready wrote: ↑Thu Oct 22, 2020 11:24 amBut pieces and pawns never can and never could maintain a fixed value.
-
- Posts: 5834
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 12:28 pm
Re: Assigning numerical values to chess pieces.
"The e-pawn is of more value than the e-pawn. "
Gertrude Stein would be proud.
When my father taught me chess, he assigned rough values to the pieces and pawns, but did say it depended on the position. So, it was not usually sensible to give up a knight for a pawn, but there were exceptions. The value of the king aggressively is possibly 2, but defensively it's infinity. A pawn is viewed as 1 and a rook 5, but if the opposing rooks are on d6 and f6 and you then play e5, you could argue either that the pawn is at that moment worth more than 1, or that you will gain 4 (5 - 1) from the exchange.
The numerical values are only a rough guide, which does not work in every situation. People still play gambits.
Gertrude Stein would be proud.
When my father taught me chess, he assigned rough values to the pieces and pawns, but did say it depended on the position. So, it was not usually sensible to give up a knight for a pawn, but there were exceptions. The value of the king aggressively is possibly 2, but defensively it's infinity. A pawn is viewed as 1 and a rook 5, but if the opposing rooks are on d6 and f6 and you then play e5, you could argue either that the pawn is at that moment worth more than 1, or that you will gain 4 (5 - 1) from the exchange.
The numerical values are only a rough guide, which does not work in every situation. People still play gambits.
-
- Posts: 5244
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:51 pm
- Location: Millom, Cumbria
Re: Assigning numerical values to chess pieces.
To answer the original question in the original post, it was "nutjobs" who thought this might make the game more comprehensible to beginners.
And do you know what, they were right.
Of course they are guidelines rather than rigid rules, just as with "a knight on the rim is dim", "don't move your Q too much early on" etc etc.
So??
And do you know what, they were right.
Of course they are guidelines rather than rigid rules, just as with "a knight on the rim is dim", "don't move your Q too much early on" etc etc.
So??
"Set up your attacks so that when the fire is out, it isn't out!" (H N Pillsbury)
-
- Posts: 3198
- Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2013 2:30 pm
Re: Assigning numerical values to chess pieces.
Yeah but so many live by it. The concept of the exchange sacrifice is not something most players would entertain because a rook is worth more than a minor piece, even though it might be stuck doing nothing for another 20 moves.It's a rough guide but how many times do you hear generic statements like the bishop pair is stronger than the knight pair applied to games where that isn't even close to the truth. Numbers can't capture the fluidity of the game, we are probably better off without them, or should have them reassigned.
-
- Posts: 3198
- Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2013 2:30 pm
Re: Assigning numerical values to chess pieces.
subversive is a better word, this forum is far too middle-class.
-
- Posts: 10364
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:06 am
- Location: Somewhere you're not
Re: Assigning numerical values to chess pieces.
<citation needed>MJMcCready wrote: ↑Thu Oct 22, 2020 1:39 pmThe concept of the exchange sacrifice is not something most players would entertain
"Do you play chess?"
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
lostontime.blogspot.com
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
lostontime.blogspot.com
-
- Posts: 3198
- Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2013 2:30 pm
Re: Assigning numerical values to chess pieces.
Ok, most players rated 140 or less
-
- Posts: 3198
- Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2013 2:30 pm
Re: Assigning numerical values to chess pieces.
Even the self-proclaimed unofficial world champion Rudi Van der Brain doesn't grasp it and he can find any mate in one within 30 minutes no matter how hard it is. You leave him with a mate in two on the board and over an hour on the clock, even if you are alphazero or carlsen, you haven't got a chance. Mate in three, he usually needs about a week. He's good with the horsey one and that one that moves slantyways if he can make it out of the opening, which usually isn't the case
-
- Posts: 10364
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:06 am
- Location: Somewhere you're not
Re: Assigning numerical values to chess pieces.
Would it be a good idea if you stopped posting for a bit?
"Do you play chess?"
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
lostontime.blogspot.com
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
lostontime.blogspot.com
-
- Posts: 3198
- Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2013 2:30 pm
Re: Assigning numerical values to chess pieces.
Or alternatively reconsider the point that some of us have a sense of humour and a more light-hearted approach, in order to liberate those who take it too seriously -and I don't charge for that also!