A Former Loophole #2-Promoted Rook Castling On The First Rank

Discuss anything you like about chess related matters in this forum.
User avatar
Rewan Demontay
Posts: 28
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2020 4:20 pm

A Former Loophole #2-Promoted Rook Castling On The First Rank

Post by Rewan Demontay » Sat Jun 13, 2020 10:12 pm

When it comes to castling, many specific rules have been made. One famous example of castling that eluded the laws for some time is castling vertically with a promoted rook. This type of castling, promoting a rook a on the e-file and moving the king up two spaces, came into mainstream public notice in 1972 with Tim-Krabbe #3 that featured all 3 castlings after his friend Max Pam noticed it. But it wasn't the first time it was noticed. The earliest known appearance of Pam-Krabbe castling dates back to 1907! You can see over a dozen problems that feature it here, where you can actually see it animated: https://pdb.dieschwalbe.de/search.jsp?e ... Rochade%27

C. Staugaard, Skakbladet 11/1907, Mate In 2 Moves


But I am not here to tallk about Pam-Krabbe castling if you read the title more closely. Instead, I am here to talk about ANOTHER type of castling with a promoted rook. Sounds impossible? Well it's not!

The earliest I have managaed to trace this heavily obscure loophole in chess history as far back as 1918, which is its probable origin.

The problem was given on August 1, 1918 in The Brooklyn Daily Eagle on page in text: https://bklyn.newspapers.com/image/55625880/

It reads: "William M. Russell, best known in local chess circles and as player and organizer, has turned his hand to composition of problems and contributes the following three-mover for the benefit of The Eagle solvers.
White (5 pieces)-K on K, B on QKt3 and QB3: P on QKt2 and KR6.
Black (1 pieces)- K on QR8
"I'm not going to give the solution," writes Mr. Russell, "but I assure you there is one, and that it does not start with a capture or a check. The idea was given to me by a position my brother showed me of one of Blackburne's games. The solution obeys every one of the laws of the British Chess Code. Sam Loyd would have liked to have been the composer of this problem."

Checkmate In 3 Moves


Image
Image

The problem was brough up again the next week, on August 8, to give a hint to the solution on page 16: https://bklyn.newspapers.com/image/55626989/. Here is the relevant text in full.

"In giving the special problem in three moves by William M. Russell last week, the request to of the author to print the motto "Castles" was overlooked. A number of telephones calls and letters had to be answered in this connection, but Orin Frink Jr. accepted the proposition in the proper spirit. Mr. Frink writes:
"I always thought that Christmas was the time for bringing up problems of which we must be assured there really is a solution, and obey every one of the laws in the British Chess Code." At any rate, any problem which obeys ALL laws at one and the same time is surely worth of the authorship of our late friend Elizabeth. In regard to the problem itself, it seems that the old "Castles, QR" gag doesn't work. The pawn on KR6 must be there to kill time, or to bite on, as it cannot queen in time to do any damage. I object to Mr. Russell's statement to the effect that the solution does not start with a capture or a check. Such hints are SO apt to give away the key move, especially in a problem of this sort.
Perhaps it might have been well to place a particular emphasis on Mr. Russell's references to the British Chess Code and in view of the motto, now supplied, it may not to be amiss to the quote from the British Chess Code the first condition of castling, which is: "(1) Neither the king or the rook have moved in the game." The solution and a last work from Mr. Russell will be printed in a week hence."

Image

And on the week hence, on August 15, the solution finally appeared under the banner "Russell's Castling Problem" on page 16: https://bklyn.newspapers.com/image/55627909/. Here are relevant snippets..

"Coming back to the 'Castling" problem of last week, which, as explained last week, hinges upon the literal reading of the British Chess Code, already quoted, little remains to be added to the exhaustive treatment of the subject by the authot herewith submittted:
The solution is supported by both ancient and modern authority. On page 8 of Alain C. White's book on "The Theory Of Pawn Promotion," and on page 14 of hia "Running The Gauntlet," you will observe that promoted Fers (the ancient queen, that could leap two squares on its first move, but on its subsequent moves could only move one square diagonal) had on being promoted had on being promoted the same privlege of leaping two squares on its first move, as in the beginning of the game. On the same theory, an unmoved king and a promoted rook can castle.
(Skipped text.) In those days, castling wasn't as widely accepted for problems as it is now days, and this part of the article tries to justify having a castling solution.
My problem has only a two move theme, Pawn Rooks and Castles, mate. By placing the Rook's Pawn on the 7th and by exchanging the White pawn on QKt2 for a Black pawn, you would have a two-mover."

Mate In 2 Moves


Image
Image

The August 15 Article was reprinted on pages 209-210 in the book "American Chess Bulletin Volumes 13-15": https://books.google.com/books?id=CqJJAAAAYAAJ&newbks

Thus was born the idea of promoting with a castling rook, but doing so on the first rank. The king moves two spaces on the first rank to the left or right, and the rook jumps of the top of the world to soar next to the king. This idea would live on, but seemingly unknown and largely unexplored, being something that you can remember but can never find the original source for.
Last edited by Rewan Demontay on Wed Jul 22, 2020 5:51 pm, edited 7 times in total.
Do you know, or wish to know, anything unusual about chess? Feel free to contact me!

User avatar
Rewan Demontay
Posts: 28
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2020 4:20 pm

Re: A Former Loophole #2-Promoted Rook Castling On The First Rank

Post by Rewan Demontay » Sat Jun 13, 2020 10:28 pm

(continued from above)

I have found very few references to this specific castling loophole in chess literature. The next appearacne I know of comes a whopping 37 years later in the Febuary 1955 edition of Chess Review on page 37: http://uscf1-nyc1.aodhosting.com/CL-AND ... 955_02.pdf. I am forever indbebted to Edward Winter for this specifc knowledge. See C.N. 10198: https://www.chesshistory.com/winter/winter148.html. The "protoype" problem in reference is unknown, but it may very well be the one by William Russell.

The text shall now be quoted in full: "We were once fascinated by a cute prototype of the above "problem," Its solution: 1 PxR(R)! Any 2 0-0·0 mate! was designed to challenge the Laws of Chess as then set forth. Hearing that the Laws had been revised, we let the position escape us. Scanning the new Laws, however, we find the idea (in position shown above) still challenges the rule-makers. The new Rook has not previously been moved! Nor are any men between the King and that Rook. Nor does White's King run into attacks hy any enemy men. So, assuming White's King has not been moved, castling is possible! Perhaps even with Rook on QN8 or QB8? Can that solution actually be legal? How would you like to spring the idea on a redoubtable but unsuspecting opponent in a similar position in an important tournament game? -J.S.B (Jack Straley Battell)"


Image

The next few references I know of how from over 50 years later, once more, on the Internet.

The earliest one is in 2007 from chessproblem.net in a thread about castling loopholes in chess variants, in which user mrmip creating this funny bit: https://www.chessproblem.net/viewtopic.php?t=232

mrmip, chessproblem.net 8/26/2008
Mate In 2, Chess960

Solution: 1. c8=R! ~ 2. 0-0-0# (The c8 rook moves moves to d1-castling in weird in Chesss960, and the king castles without moving in a sense in this poistion.)

A small reference is made here, from 2011-https://chess3.wordpress.com/2011/08/13/castling-rules/

In 2008, in a blog post entitled "In the twilight zone of chess rules," a new problem appeared. For the first time, the idea was realized in its minimal possbile form-http://faroffchess.blogspot.com/2008/12 ... rules.html

Jens Kristiansen, Far Off Chess 12/13/2008
Mate In 2


**********

This is what little I know about this very old and obscure second type of castling with a promoted rook. Any and all replies and extra information/input is welcome and appreciated.
Last edited by Rewan Demontay on Thu Jul 23, 2020 1:26 am, edited 1 time in total.
Do you know, or wish to know, anything unusual about chess? Feel free to contact me!

User avatar
Rewan Demontay
Posts: 28
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2020 4:20 pm

Re: A Former Loophole #2-Promoted Rook Castling On The First Rank

Post by Rewan Demontay » Thu Jun 18, 2020 6:17 pm

This problem shows takes the idea to it's maximum.

Mate In 2, 8 Solutions
Do you know, or wish to know, anything unusual about chess? Feel free to contact me!

User avatar
Rewan Demontay
Posts: 28
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2020 4:20 pm

Re: A Former Loophole #2-Promoted Rook Castling On The First Rank

Post by Rewan Demontay » Sun Mar 05, 2023 7:40 am

Here is another example that I forget to share, also courtesy of Edward Winter: https://www.chesshistory.com/winter/win ... ml#CN_9300

Edgar D. Holladay & Jose Benardete, Chess Life , p. 2, 20/10/1949,
"The Law's Flaw"


The original source is viewable: http://uscf1-nyc1.aodhosting.com/CL-AND ... 9_10_2.pdf
Do you know, or wish to know, anything unusual about chess? Feel free to contact me!

User avatar
Christopher Kreuzer
Posts: 8824
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 2:34 am
Location: London

Re: A Former Loophole #2-Promoted Rook Castling On The First Rank

Post by Christopher Kreuzer » Sun Mar 05, 2023 10:33 am

Am still working my way through these, but wanted to thank Rewan for posting these fascinating examples! (I missed them first time round when the initial posts were made in 2020.)

User avatar
Rewan Demontay
Posts: 28
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2020 4:20 pm

Re: A Former Loophole #2-Promoted Rook Castling On The First Rank

Post by Rewan Demontay » Sun Mar 05, 2023 5:17 pm

Happy to help. I've loopholes articles like this I've had the shelf for a few years now, will get them out soon enough.
Do you know, or wish to know, anything unusual about chess? Feel free to contact me!

User avatar
Joey Stewart
Posts: 1865
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 2:35 pm
Location: All Of Them

Re: A Former Loophole #2-Promoted Rook Castling On The First Rank

Post by Joey Stewart » Sun Mar 05, 2023 5:41 pm

Quite interesting to see how the game has developed- this one takes long castling to a whole new level.

Sometimes I look at the endless set of fide rules and wonder if they were all necessary but then you see articles like these and realise just how many rule benders there have been over the years that needed shuttung down - I've heard another one of people promoting to a second king, presumably on the basis that it is very difficult to simultaneously checkmate two kings.
Lose one queen and it is a disaster, Lose 1000 queens and it is just a statistic.

User avatar
Rewan Demontay
Posts: 28
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2020 4:20 pm

Re: A Former Loophole #2-Promoted Rook Castling On The First Rank

Post by Rewan Demontay » Sun Mar 05, 2023 6:00 pm

Promoting to your own/the enemy king, perhaps with multiple of one or both sides' kings, is an old one indeed. That joke never has and never will be consistent as to how best to implement a winning condition.
Do you know, or wish to know, anything unusual about chess? Feel free to contact me!