End of an era
-
- Posts: 339
- Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2019 4:18 pm
End of an era
From Ray Keene's chess column in today's Spectator:
"After 42 years without missing a week, this is my last column for The Spectator."
The final game of the column is Keene-Kovacevic (1973).
"After 42 years without missing a week, this is my last column for The Spectator."
The final game of the column is Keene-Kovacevic (1973).
-
- Posts: 5234
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:51 pm
- Location: Millom, Cumbria
Re: End of an era
As has been pointed out, the claim to have not missed a week is typically "Keeneian".
"Set up your attacks so that when the fire is out, it isn't out!" (H N Pillsbury)
-
- Posts: 149
- Joined: Wed Dec 11, 2013 7:37 am
Re: End of an era
Concerning Raymond Keene's claim to have written The Spectator's chess column for "42 years without missing a week", these were the columnists during a six-week run in 1986:
11 October: David Spanier
18 October: Raymond Keene
25 October: David Spanier
1 November: David Levy
8 November: Raymond Keene
15 November: David Spanier.
11 October: David Spanier
18 October: Raymond Keene
25 October: David Spanier
1 November: David Levy
8 November: Raymond Keene
15 November: David Spanier.
-
- Posts: 553
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2010 5:51 pm
Re: End of an era
There is no mention of his successor, or is the column being dropped?
-
- Posts: 10364
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:06 am
- Location: Somewhere you're not
Re: End of an era
Also, you know, given that the content was very often taken from somebody else...Matt Mackenzie wrote: ↑Sat Sep 28, 2019 12:08 amAs has been pointed out, the claim to have not missed a week is typically "Keeneian".
"Do you play chess?"
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
lostontime.blogspot.com
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
lostontime.blogspot.com
-
- Posts: 348
- Joined: Sun Jan 26, 2014 9:23 pm
Re: End of an era
One would like to think he had been rumbled ... after such sterling service - but probably not. Surprised that he didn't claim the longevity record.
-
- Posts: 10364
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:06 am
- Location: Somewhere you're not
Re: End of an era
They knew very well.Andy Stoker wrote: ↑Wed Oct 02, 2019 12:06 pmOne would like to think he had been rumbled ... after such sterling service - but probably not.
"Do you play chess?"
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
lostontime.blogspot.com
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
lostontime.blogspot.com
-
- Posts: 1915
- Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2015 2:44 pm
Re: End of an era
Frankly, I'm not too sure that the wider world cares too much about plagiarism. Obviously the original authors do, because it's annoying to see others taking credit for and/or making money from their work, but otherwise plagiarism passes unnoticed except for the minority of committed readers who actually realise that they have come across the same thing elsewhere.
Besides which, to take the most obvious example, if one is writing an openings treatise then it's prudent to build on what has been written elsewhere. But in some lines the new author has little substantial to add in which case, although s/he may play around with the words in order to avoid plagiarism in its literal sense, the end-result in those particular lines can of necessity be little more than intellectual plagiarism. That's not to condone the practice but to set it into context.
Besides which, to take the most obvious example, if one is writing an openings treatise then it's prudent to build on what has been written elsewhere. But in some lines the new author has little substantial to add in which case, although s/he may play around with the words in order to avoid plagiarism in its literal sense, the end-result in those particular lines can of necessity be little more than intellectual plagiarism. That's not to condone the practice but to set it into context.
-
- Posts: 10364
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:06 am
- Location: Somewhere you're not
Re: End of an era
It's not however a context that fits this particular practice.
(Also, of course, it's about much more than plagiarism - it's about all kinds of lazy, sloppy and tenth-rate journalism, of which the plagiarism, extensive though it was, was only the most serious manifestation.)
(Also, of course, it's about much more than plagiarism - it's about all kinds of lazy, sloppy and tenth-rate journalism, of which the plagiarism, extensive though it was, was only the most serious manifestation.)
"Do you play chess?"
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
lostontime.blogspot.com
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
lostontime.blogspot.com
-
- Posts: 1915
- Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2015 2:44 pm
Re: End of an era
There's no greater reason for grandmasters to be competent journalists than for journalists to be good chess players. Good wordsmiths are few and far between. However, I would differ from Justin and instead argue that the "most serious" issue is an inability to check facts - Edward Winter's Chess Notes sometimes lists dozens of inaccuracies in a single book. If a writer can't get dates and places correct, and apparently doesn't use a proof-reader, how confident should anyone be as to the accuracy of the published chess analysis?JustinHorton wrote: ↑Wed Oct 02, 2019 6:19 pmIt's not however a context that fits this particular practice.
(Also, of course, it's about much more than plagiarism - it's about all kinds of lazy, sloppy and tenth-rate journalism, of which the plagiarism, extensive though it was, was only the most serious manifestation.)
-
- Posts: 2151
- Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 1:37 am
Re: End of an era
Aside from the original authors, readers and/or commissioning editors and/or examiners might care - and feel cheated... Plagiarism isn't only noticed by authors and committed readers, it's also noticed by others if it's publicised.Roger Lancaster wrote: ↑Wed Oct 02, 2019 2:55 pmFrankly, I'm not too sure that the wider world cares too much about plagiarism. Obviously the original authors do, because it's annoying to see others taking credit for and/or making money from their work, but otherwise plagiarism passes unnoticed except for the minority of committed readers who actually realise that they have come across the same thing elsewhere.
You could at least provide attribution.Roger Lancaster wrote: ↑Wed Oct 02, 2019 2:55 pmBesides which, to take the most obvious example, if one is writing an openings treatise then it's prudent to build on what has been written elsewhere. But in some lines the new author has little substantial to add in which case, although s/he may play around with the words in order to avoid plagiarism in its literal sense, the end-result in those particular lines can of necessity be little more than intellectual plagiarism. That's not to condone the practice but to set it into context.
-
- Posts: 2151
- Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 1:37 am
Re: End of an era
And if a writer plagiarises, how confident can you be in anything else they do?Roger Lancaster wrote: ↑Wed Oct 02, 2019 8:29 pmThere's no greater reason for grandmasters to be competent journalists than for journalists to be good chess players. Good wordsmiths are few and far between. However, I would differ from Justin and instead argue that the "most serious" issue is an inability to check facts - Edward Winter's Chess Notes sometimes lists dozens of inaccuracies in a single book. If a writer can't get dates and places correct, and apparently doesn't use a proof-reader, how confident should anyone be as to the accuracy of the published chess analysis?JustinHorton wrote: ↑Wed Oct 02, 2019 6:19 pmIt's not however a context that fits this particular practice.
(Also, of course, it's about much more than plagiarism - it's about all kinds of lazy, sloppy and tenth-rate journalism, of which the plagiarism, extensive though it was, was only the most serious manifestation.)
-
- Posts: 10364
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:06 am
- Location: Somewhere you're not
Re: End of an era
I think theft is more serious than laziness and incompetence, but given that in this instance the former grew out of the latter, I guess it's not so important where you place each of them on the podium.
"Do you play chess?"
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
lostontime.blogspot.com
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
lostontime.blogspot.com
-
- Posts: 9085
- Joined: Sat May 30, 2009 5:18 pm
- Location: Oldbury, Worcestershire
Re: End of an era
If the subject is moving on to books...Roger Lancaster wrote: ↑Wed Oct 02, 2019 8:29 pmThere's no greater reason for grandmasters to be competent journalists than for journalists to be good chess players. Good wordsmiths are few and far between. However, I would differ from Justin and instead argue that the "most serious" issue is an inability to check facts - Edward Winter's Chess Notes sometimes lists dozens of inaccuracies in a single book. If a writer can't get dates and places correct, and apparently doesn't use a proof-reader, how confident should anyone be as to the accuracy of the published chess analysis?JustinHorton wrote: ↑Wed Oct 02, 2019 6:19 pmIt's not however a context that fits this particular practice.
(Also, of course, it's about much more than plagiarism - it's about all kinds of lazy, sloppy and tenth-rate journalism, of which the plagiarism, extensive though it was, was only the most serious manifestation.)
Presumably most, if not all, buyers of chess books are doing so for the analysis of the topic by the author. I would imagine that in a world with finite resources for spending on error-proofing, authors are more likely to concentrate their energies on the quality and accuracy of the analysis rather than trivialities like whether the game was played in Amsterdam or Rotterdam, about which the typical reader is probably uninterested?
What does surprise me is that given chessplayers are a subset of humanity normally associated with being pernickety about detail, this does not appear to extend to the subset of chessplayers who author books.
-
- Posts: 21313
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm
Re: End of an era
Sporting history surely. It's like writing that the 1981 test match where Willis took 8 wickets was played in Birmingham against the West Indies. It was the late ErIc Schiller who was often responsible for similar chess howlers.Alex Holowczak wrote: ↑Wed Oct 02, 2019 8:43 pmwhether the game was played in Amsterdam or Rotterdam, about which the typical reader is probably uninterested?