British Chess Championships 2010
-
Nick Thomas
- Posts: 456
- Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2008 9:56 pm
Re: British Chess Championships 2010
Someone na hour (or day) before the game could have been writing a note while leaning on top of the scoresheet...
-
Mike Truran
- Posts: 2424
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 3:44 pm
- Contact:
Re: British Chess Championships 2010
Little b*****d. He wouldn't have lasted long under the Khmer Rouge. He probably has specs and an intellectual accent too.
-
Matthew Turner
- Posts: 3617
- Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 11:54 am
Re: British Chess Championships 2010
Alex,
It looks like Sebatian Muheim has played ay Hastings, so that accounts for a lot of the games. I don't really see any reason to presume he is resident in the UK. The vast majority of his FIDE are from France. I wonder if he is eligible.
It looks like Sebatian Muheim has played ay Hastings, so that accounts for a lot of the games. I don't really see any reason to presume he is resident in the UK. The vast majority of his FIDE are from France. I wonder if he is eligible.
-
Alex Holowczak
- Posts: 9311
- Joined: Sat May 30, 2009 5:18 pm
- Location: Oldbury, Worcestershire
- Contact:
Re: British Chess Championships 2010
The marks are in the form of chess moves. It's not just random scribbles.Rob Thompson wrote:are you sure that the U-11 wasn't pressing on his sheet with the other end of his pen/equivalent? It would leave a mark on the lower sheet without leaving one on the upper sheet
It has happened three rounds in a row though, for the same player. Yesterday, I thought it was a co-incidence. Now I think there's something fishy going on.Nick Thomas wrote:Someone na hour (or day) before the game could have been writing a note while leaning on top of the scoresheet...
I'm pretty sure a quiet word in his ear is enough to diffuse the problem.Mike Truran wrote:Little b*****d. He wouldn't have lasted long under the Khmer Rouge. He probably has specs and an intellectual accent too.
-
Alex Holowczak
- Posts: 9311
- Joined: Sat May 30, 2009 5:18 pm
- Location: Oldbury, Worcestershire
- Contact:
Re: British Chess Championships 2010
I will mention this to Dave Welch in the morning then.Matthew Turner wrote:Alex,
It looks like Sebatian Muheim has played ay Hastings, so that accounts for a lot of the games. I don't really see any reason to presume he is resident in the UK. The vast majority of his FIDE are from France. I wonder if he is eligible.
-
Sean Hewitt
Re: British Chess Championships 2010
Sébastien is French. He had a French address when he played 9 games at Uxbridge earlier this year. However, his mother is English. I don't know if that counts for eligibility.Matthew Turner wrote:Is the top seed in the U16 Swiss or French? How is he eligible to play?
I also notice that their is a Luxembourg player in the U16 who also played at Uxbridge. I don't know how he is eligible for the British.
- Carl Hibbard
- Posts: 6134
- Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 8:05 pm
- Location: Evesham
Re: British Chess Championships 2010
Ok...
In total there are 32 users online :: 8 registered, 2 hidden and 22 guests (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
10:32pm
Who is everyone - come on register people
In total there are 32 users online :: 8 registered, 2 hidden and 22 guests (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
10:32pm
Who is everyone - come on register people
Cheers
Carl Hibbard
Carl Hibbard
-
Jonathan Bryant
- Posts: 3452
- Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 3:54 pm
Re: British Chess Championships 2010
Of course the real question is ... is it a giant pencil or a normal sized one?Rob Thompson wrote:are you sure that the U-11 wasn't pressing on his sheet with the other end of his pen/equivalent?
The Abysmal Depths of Chess: https://theabysmaldepthsofchess.blogspot.com
-
Ian Thompson
- Posts: 4255
- Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2008 4:31 pm
- Location: Awbridge, Hampshire
Re: British Chess Championships 2010
I only ever log in while I'm writing a post, although that doesn't always result in a post as I sometimes change my mind halfway through writing it, so you'd normally see me as a guest. I often leave the forum open in a browser window whilst doing other things, so I'd appear as a guest a lot of the time (or would I, if I'm not doing anything?). I don't leave myself logged in because I prefer the logged out view of the forum to the logged in one.Carl Hibbard wrote:Ok...
In total there are 32 users online :: 8 registered, 2 hidden and 22 guests (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
10:32pm
Who is everyone - come on register people
-
Steve Rooney
- Posts: 427
- Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2009 2:36 pm
- Location: Church Stretton
Re: British Chess Championships 2010
I'm here too. Just catching up with British while stopped at Newport Pagnell services on long diverted route home from Gatwick. I too prefer the view when not logged in.Ian Thompson wrote:I only ever log in while I'm writing a post, although that doesn't always result in a post as I sometimes change my mind halfway through writing it, so you'd normally see me as a guest. I often leave the forum open in a browser window whilst doing other things, so I'd appear as a guest a lot of the time (or would I, if I'm not doing anything?). I don't leave myself logged in because I prefer the logged out view of the forum to the logged in one.Carl Hibbard wrote:Ok...
In total there are 32 users online :: 8 registered, 2 hidden and 22 guests (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
10:32pm
Who is everyone - come on register people
Shropshire Chess Congress
http://www.shropshirechesscongress.org.uk
http://www.shropshirechesscongress.org.uk
-
Phil Makepeace
- Posts: 342
- Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2007 12:46 pm
Re: British Chess Championships 2010
We deal with everything Spartacus today.
-
Richard Bates
- Posts: 3466
- Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 8:27 pm
Re: British Chess Championships 2010
Accelerated pairings:
1) The point about the decisive phase of the tournament being brought forward is very valid. It is much better to get over the supposed mismatches in the early rounds.
2) Is it fair or justified that the player(s) at the very top of the field (ie. those who don't have an early accident) have such a difference in field strength compared with others who might approach the final rounds only a point or half a point behind?
3) Is one of the fundamental justifications for accelerating draws undermined by FIDE's ill thought through extension of the rating list to 1200 causing such an increasing number of arguably significantly underrated juniors? It's getting to the stage where it is necessary to consult the ECF(!) grading list to gain any realistic idea of a player's strength.
1) The point about the decisive phase of the tournament being brought forward is very valid. It is much better to get over the supposed mismatches in the early rounds.
2) Is it fair or justified that the player(s) at the very top of the field (ie. those who don't have an early accident) have such a difference in field strength compared with others who might approach the final rounds only a point or half a point behind?
3) Is one of the fundamental justifications for accelerating draws undermined by FIDE's ill thought through extension of the rating list to 1200 causing such an increasing number of arguably significantly underrated juniors? It's getting to the stage where it is necessary to consult the ECF(!) grading list to gain any realistic idea of a player's strength.
-
Alex Holowczak
- Posts: 9311
- Joined: Sat May 30, 2009 5:18 pm
- Location: Oldbury, Worcestershire
- Contact:
Re: British Chess Championships 2010
I spoke to Dave Welch about the scoresheet problem. He suspected that there was another scoresheet that the player was writing on, and that this was being shown on the scoresheets underneath; hence the problem. He was almost exactly right. At the start of the round, the junior in question was seen to be tearing off the pink copy (third copy) of his scoresheet, and filling that in, because the ink from his pen could not be seen on it. To save space, he then put the pink copy on top of the white copy while filling bits in. This could then be seen on the yellow copy. Mystery solved!
-
David Sedgwick
- Posts: 5252
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 5:56 pm
- Location: Croydon
- Contact:
Re: British Chess Championships 2010
The players in question are eligible to play if they are British (or Irish) citizens, even if they have dual nationality and/or they don't live in the British Isles. I don't know anything about the facts of either case.Sean Hewitt wrote:Sébastien is French. He had a French address when he played 9 games at Uxbridge earlier this year. However, his mother is English. I don't know if that counts for eligibility.Matthew Turner wrote:Is the top seed in the U16 Swiss or French? How is he eligible to play?
I also notice that their is a Luxembourg player in the U16 who also played at Uxbridge. I don't know how he is eligible for the British.
-
Stewart Reuben
- Posts: 4566
- Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:04 pm
- Location: writer
Re: British Chess Championships 2010
Richard Bates >2) Is it fair or justified that the player(s) at the very top of the field (ie. those who don't have an early accident) have such a difference in field strength compared with others who might approach the final rounds only a point or half a point behind?
3) Is one of the fundamental justifications for accelerating draws undermined by FIDE's ill thought through extension of the rating list to 1200 causing such an increasing number of arguably significantly underrated juniors? It's getting to the stage where it is necessary to consult the ECF(!) grading list to gain any realistic idea of a player's strength.<
Jonathan Mestel once wrote an article in BCM. He offered the opinion that there is nothing wrong with ANY Swiss Pairing System, what is wrong is assigning the placings according to raw score.
If you used TPR you would get a more 'valid' result. But raw score is clearly much easier to understand.
A lottery pairing system does not take into account pre-conceived ideas of playing strength from ratings. However, each event will throw up different anomalies.
The Burstein system relies after 3 rounds on Bucholz. I abhor it personally, although it is conceptually logical.
The Dubov system seeks to balance off strength of opposition and is heavily reliant on accurate ratings.
We have flirted with all these systems and others.
In case Adam doers not realise, descriptions of these systems can be found in my book. It was not written for 11 year olds, few of whom are organisers. I would enjoy seeing him explaining what electricity is to a group of 11 year olds.
I couldn't agree less with Richard Bates' statement about the FIDE Ratings going down to 1200. The intention was announced in 1999 (at my suggestion) to go eventually down to 1000 and I expect that to be reached next year. Surely that has been adequate advance notice for him to lodge objections? Since Acceleration makes use of ratings, I cannot understand why he thinks it would be better to have no rating at all. He could argue, if he wishes, for the system to use Ratings down to the age of 16 and Grades under that, but it would be cumbersome. Anyway, so far the British this year is an excellent advertisement for the system used.
Stewart Reuben
3) Is one of the fundamental justifications for accelerating draws undermined by FIDE's ill thought through extension of the rating list to 1200 causing such an increasing number of arguably significantly underrated juniors? It's getting to the stage where it is necessary to consult the ECF(!) grading list to gain any realistic idea of a player's strength.<
Jonathan Mestel once wrote an article in BCM. He offered the opinion that there is nothing wrong with ANY Swiss Pairing System, what is wrong is assigning the placings according to raw score.
If you used TPR you would get a more 'valid' result. But raw score is clearly much easier to understand.
A lottery pairing system does not take into account pre-conceived ideas of playing strength from ratings. However, each event will throw up different anomalies.
The Burstein system relies after 3 rounds on Bucholz. I abhor it personally, although it is conceptually logical.
The Dubov system seeks to balance off strength of opposition and is heavily reliant on accurate ratings.
We have flirted with all these systems and others.
In case Adam doers not realise, descriptions of these systems can be found in my book. It was not written for 11 year olds, few of whom are organisers. I would enjoy seeing him explaining what electricity is to a group of 11 year olds.
I couldn't agree less with Richard Bates' statement about the FIDE Ratings going down to 1200. The intention was announced in 1999 (at my suggestion) to go eventually down to 1000 and I expect that to be reached next year. Surely that has been adequate advance notice for him to lodge objections? Since Acceleration makes use of ratings, I cannot understand why he thinks it would be better to have no rating at all. He could argue, if he wishes, for the system to use Ratings down to the age of 16 and Grades under that, but it would be cumbersome. Anyway, so far the British this year is an excellent advertisement for the system used.
Stewart Reuben