Search found 4 matches
- Mon Mar 14, 2011 12:24 pm
- Forum: General Chat
- Topic: 129th Varsity Match.
- Replies: 117
- Views: 13457
Re: 129th Varsity Match.
Re. 4NCL, I get tired of the point being made that the Cambridge University team isn't restricted in terms of membership. Membership is (and has always been) either because of a connection to Cambridge Uni, or by invitation. The invitation element is possible because a lot of current Cambridge stude...
- Sun Mar 13, 2011 12:39 pm
- Forum: General Chat
- Topic: 129th Varsity Match.
- Replies: 117
- Views: 13457
Re: 129th Varsity Match.
The view was taken that internal matches (e.g. Peterhouse v. Pembroke) wouldn't count. They would have to be against a non-University team. It's a clever trick as it doesn't affect current student as they qualify on residence in any case. That was why there was so much outrage from the Cambridge tea...
- Sun Mar 13, 2011 12:22 pm
- Forum: General Chat
- Topic: 129th Varsity Match.
- Replies: 117
- Views: 13457
Re: 129th Varsity Match.
Just responding to Jonathan Rogers point about qualifying to play for the county. Jonathan, I suspect you are not aware of all of the facts. Firstly, changing the rules to require you to play a match in an intra county league doesn't make much sense for Cambridge. The league is tiny and is made up a...
- Fri Mar 11, 2011 12:34 pm
- Forum: General Chat
- Topic: 129th Varsity Match.
- Replies: 117
- Views: 13457
Re: 129th Varsity Match.
If I may interject, I did play for Cambridge in 2000 in the county championship, and it was a bit controversial, as I was registered with Writtle (in Essex) and had always played for Essex in the past (but had not done so that season). That said, I had moved schools for sixth form (new school was in...